Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27362911›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2017

Pompe disease in adulthood: effects of antibody formation on enzyme replacement therapy.

Juna M de Vries, Esther Kuperus, Marianne Hoogeveen-Westerveld, Marian A Kroos, Stephan C A Wens, Merel Stok, Nadine A M E van der Beek, Michelle E Kruijshaar, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Pieter A van Doorn and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Neuromuscular Development and Disease: Learning FromFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juna M de VriesCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther KuperusCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marianne Hoogeveen-WesterveldCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marian A KroosCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stephan C A WensCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Merel StokCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6030-1820
Nadine A M E van der BeekCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michelle E KruijshaarCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dimitris RizopoulosDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter A van DoornCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ans T van der PloegCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
W W M Pim PijnappelCenter for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7042-2482
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the effect of antibodies against recombinant human acid α-glucosidase (rhGAA) on treatment efficacy and safety, and to test whether the GAA genotype is involved in antibody formation.

methodsWe used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine anti-rhGAA antibody titers at baseline and at 6, 12, and 36 months of rhGAA treatment. We measured the capacity of antibodies to neutralize rhGAA enzymatic activity or cellular uptake and the effects on infusion-associated reactions (IARs), muscle strength, and pulmonary function.

resultsOf 73 patients, 45 developed antibodies. Maximal titers were high (≥1:31,250) in 22% of patients, intermediate (1:1,250-1:31,250) in 40%, and none or low (0-1:1,250) in 38%. The common IVS1/delex18 GAA genotype was absent only in the high-titer group. The height of the titer positively correlated with the occurrence and number of IARs (P ≤ 0.001). On the group level, antibody titers did not correlate with treatment efficacy. Eight patients (11%) developed very high maximal titers (≥156,250), but only one patient showed high sustained neutralizing antibodies that probably interfered with treatment efficacy.

conclusionsIn adults with Pompe disease, antibody formation does not interfere with rhGAA efficacy in the majority of patients, is associated with IARs, and may be attenuated by the IVS1/delex18 GAA genotype.Genet Med 19 1, 90-97.

Indexed as

AdultAgedalpha-GlucosidasesAntibody FormationEnzyme Replacement TherapyFemaleGenotypeGlycogen Storage Disease Type IIHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecombinant Proteinsalpha-GlucosidasesGAA protein, humanRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27362911
OpenAlexW2460234981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.