Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27362760›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Role of Chemotherapy in Advanced and Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET).

Matthew H Wong, David L Chan, Adrian Lee, Bob T Li, Sumit Lumba, Stephen J Clarke, Jaswinder Samra, Nick Pavlakis

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Phase II Study of ONC201 in Neuroendocrine Tumors including Pheochromocytoma-Paraganglioma and Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Combination treatments to enhance peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Chemotherapy in NETs: When and how.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew H WongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia.
David L ChanKolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-3144
Adrian LeeKolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Bob T LiDivision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Sumit LumbaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Stephen J ClarkeKolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jaswinder SamraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore and Macquarie University Hospitals, Sydney, Australia.
Nick PavlakisKolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AU

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesIn the era of somatostatin analogues and targeted therapies, the role of chemotherapy in NET remains largely undefined. This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of chemotherapy on response rates (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity compared to other chemotherapies/systemic therapies or best supportive care in patients with advanced or metastatic NET.

methodsRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 1946 to 2015 were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, other databases and conference proceedings. Review of abstracts, quality assessment and data abstraction were performed independently by two investigators. Meta-analyses were conducted using Mantel-Haenszel analysis with random-effects modelling.

resultsSix RCTs comparing standard streptozotocin plus 5-fluorouacil (STZ/5FU) chemotherapy to other chemotherapy regimens, and 2 comparing this to interferon (IFN) were included. Only 1 study was considered at low risk of bias. STZ/5-FU was no different to other chemotherapies in response rate [RR 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-1.27], PFS (RR 0.95; CI 0.81-1.13), or OS (RR 1.03; CI 0.77-1.39). IFN may produce higher response than STZ/5FU (RR 0.20; CI 0.04-1.13), but event rates were small and survival was no different. Interferon was associated with higher overall haematological (RR 0.47; CI 0.27-0.82) and lower overall renal toxicity (RR 3.61; CI 1.24-10.51).

conclusionStrong evidence is lacking in the area of chemotherapy in neuroendocrine tumors. There is currently no evidence that one chemotherapeutic regimen is significantly better than the other, nor is interferon better than chemotherapy. There is an urgent need to design RCTs comparing modern chemotherapy to other agents in NET.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalFluorouracilHumansInterferonsNeoplasm MetastasisNeuroendocrine TumorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSomatostatinStreptozocinTreatment OutcomeFluorouracilInterferonsSomatostatinStreptozocin

Identifiers

PMID27362760
PMCPMC4928873
OpenAlexW2460572465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.