Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27362745›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2016

Conformational Dynamics and the Binding of Specific and Nonspecific DNA by the Autoinhibited Transcription Factor Ets-1.

Geneviève Desjardins, Mark Okon, Barbara J Graves, Lawrence P McIntosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Geneviève DesjardinsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Chemistry, and Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Mark OkonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Chemistry, and Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Barbara J GravesDepartment of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-5550, United States.
Lawrence P McIntoshDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Chemistry, and Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CACanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre · CAHuntsman Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Transcriptional Control Mechanisms by ETS FactorsR01GM038663 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRAVES, BARBARA J · 1992 to 2015
$3.9M
CIHR MOP-136834NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The affinity of the Ets-1 transcription factor for DNA is autoinhibited by an intrinsically disordered serine-rich region (SRR) and a helical inhibitory module (IM) appended to its winged helix-turn-helix ETS domain. Using NMR spectroscopy, we investigated how Ets-1 recognizes specific versus nonspecific DNA, with a focus on the roles of protein dynamics and autoinhibition in these processes. Upon binding either DNA, the two marginally stable N-terminal helices of the IM predominantly unfold, but still sample partially ordered conformations. Also, on the basis of amide chemical shift perturbation mapping, Ets-1 associates with both specific and nonspecific DNA through the same canonical ETS domain interface. These interactions are structurally independent of the SRR, and thus autoinhibition does not impart DNA-binding specificity. However, relative to the pronounced NMR spectroscopic changes in Ets-1 resulting from specific DNA binding, the spectra of the nonspecific DNA complexes showed conformational exchange broadening and lacked several diagnostic amide and indole signals attributable to hydrogen bonding interactions seen in reported X-ray crystallographic structures of this transcription factor with its cognate DNA sequences. Such differences are highlighted by the chemical shift and relaxation properties of several interfacial lysine and arginine side chains. Collectively, these data support a general model in which Ets-1 interacts with nonspecific DNA via dynamic electrostatic interactions, whereas hydrogen bonding drives the formation of well-ordered complexes with specific DNA.

Indexed as

AnimalsArginineBase SequenceDNALysineMiceModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1Recombinant ProteinsStatic ElectricityArginineDNAEts1 protein, mouseLysineProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27362745
PMCPMC5568661
OpenAlexW2473812116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.