Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27362732›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of occupational and environmental health2016

Examination of postures and frequency of musculoskeletal disorders among manual workers in Calcutta, India.

Krishnendu Sarkar, Samrat Dev, Tamal Das, Sabarni Chakrabarty, Somnath Gangopadhyay

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of occupational and environmental health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physical working conditions over time: a repeated cross-sectional study in German employees.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Preventive factors against work-related musculoskeletal disorders: narrative review.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Occupational Ergonomics: A Special Domain for the Benefit of Workers' Health.Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krishnendu Sarkara Occupational Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Physiology , University College of Science and Technology, University of Calcutta , Kolkata , India.
Samrat Deva Occupational Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Physiology , University College of Science and Technology, University of Calcutta , Kolkata , India.
Tamal Dasb Department of Physiology , Vidyasagar Evening College , Kolkata , India.
Sabarni Chakrabartya Occupational Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Physiology , University College of Science and Technology, University of Calcutta , Kolkata , India.
Somnath Gangopadhyaya Occupational Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Physiology , University College of Science and Technology, University of Calcutta , Kolkata , India.
University of Calcutta · INUniversity B.T. & Evening College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManual material handling (MMH) activities require workers to adopt various awkward postures leading to the development of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD).

objectivesTo investigate the postures adopted during heavy load handling and the frequency of MSDs among MMH workers in Calcutta, India.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study with 100 MMH workers. MSD frequency was assessed via the Standardized Nordic Questionnaire. The Ovako Working Posture Assessment System (OWAS) was used to analyze working posture. We used logistic regression to predict MSD risk factors.

resultsNinety five percent of workers reported a MSD in at least one body part in the past 12 months. According to OWAS results, 83% of the analysed work postures require immediate corrective measures for worker safety. The most harmful posture was carrying a heavy load overhead. Carrying more than 120 kg increased the odds of low back and neck pain by 4.527 and 4.555, respectively.

conclusionsThis sample had a high frequency of reported MSDs, likely attributed to physiologically strenuous occupational activities repeated on average of 30-40 times daily. Ergonomic interventions, such as the use of handcarts, and occupational training are urgently needed.

Indexed as

PostureAdultCross-Sectional StudiesErgonomicsHeart RateHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational DiseasesRespiratory RateSkin TemperatureSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultInformal sectorManual material handlingMusculoskeletal disorderNordic musculoskeletal questionnaireOWAS

Identifiers

PMID27362732
PMCPMC4984967
OpenAlexW2467234226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.