Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27362589›Full record

ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2016

Clinical Information Systems - From Yesterday to Tomorrow.

R M Gardner

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. So What? A Tribute to Dr. Reed M. Gardner, PhD, FACMI.Applied clinical informatics · 2021
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R M GardnerReed M. Gardner, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 1745 Cornell Circle (Home Address), Salt Lake City, UT 84108, Tel: +1 801 581 1164, Cell: +1 801 455 8207, E-mail: reed.gardner@hsc.utah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the history of clinical information systems over the past twenty-five years and project anticipated changes to those systems over the next twenty-five years.

methodsOver 250 Medline references about clinical information systems, quality of patient care, and patient safety were reviewed. Books, Web resources, and the author's personal experience with developing the HELP system were also used.

resultsThere have been dramatic improvements in the use and acceptance of clinical computing systems and Electronic Health Records (EHRs), especially in the United States. Although there are still challenges with the implementation of such systems, the rate of progress has been remarkable. Over the next twenty-five years, there will remain many important opportunities and challenges. These opportunities include understanding complex clinical computing issues that must be studied, understood and optimized. Dramatic improvements in quality of care and patient safety must be anticipated as a result of the use of clinical information systems. These improvements will result from a closer involvement of clinical informaticians in the optimization of patient care processes.

conclusionsClinical information systems and computerized clinical decision support have made contributions to medicine in the past. Therefore, by using better medical knowledge, optimized clinical information systems, and computerized clinical decision, we will enable dramatic improvements in both the quality and safety of patient care in the next twenty-five years.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsForecastingHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInformation SystemsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPatient SafetyClinical informaticscomputer assisteddecision makingelectronic health recordspatient safety

Identifiers

PMID27362589
PMCPMC5171508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.