Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27362479›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2016

Blood Pressure Profile and Hypertensive Organ Damage in COPD Patients and Matched Controls. The RETAPOC Study.

Rafael Golpe, Alfonso Mateos-Colino, Ana Testa-Fernández, Marta Pena-Seijo, Manuel Rodríguez-Enríquez, Carlos González-Juanatey, Francisco J Martín-Vázquez, Antonio Pose-Reino, Nuria Domínguez-Pin, Nuria Garnacho-Gayarre and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comprehensive, robust, and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS analysis of free biogenic monoamines and their metabolites in urine.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2018
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rafael GolpeRespiratory Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Alfonso Mateos-ColinoInternal Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Ana Testa-FernándezCardiology Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Marta Pena-SeijoInternal Medicine Service, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Manuel Rodríguez-EnríquezOphthalmology Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Carlos González-JuanateyCardiology Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Francisco J Martín-VázquezEOXI Lugo, Cervo e Monforte de Lemos, Galician Health Service, Lugo, Spain.
Antonio Pose-ReinoInternal Medicine Service, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Nuria Domínguez-PinInternal Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Nuria Garnacho-GayarreLaboratory Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Calle Dr. Ulises Romero n°1, 27003, Lugo, Spain.
Luis A Pérez-de-LlanoRespiratory Medicine Service, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies suggest that there is a pathogenic link between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular diseases. On the other hand, increased sympathetic tone has been described in several respiratory diseases. Our objective was to determine whether hypertension mediated by sympathetic overactivity is a mechanism that explains the association between COPD and cardiovascular diseases.

methodsProspective nested case-control observational study; 67 COPD patients were matched 1:1 by sex and age to controls with smoking history. 24 hour-blood pressure monitoring, urinary catecholamines and their metabolites measurement, echocardiography, carotid ultrasound examination, nocturnal oximetry and retinography were performed.

findingsclassic cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities were similarly distributed between cases and controls. No significant differences for blood pressure variables (difference for mean systolic blood pressure: -0·13 mmHg; 95% CI: -4·48,4·20; p = 0·94; similar results for all blood presssure variables) or catecholamines values were found between both groups. There was a tendency for lower left ventricle ejection fraction in the COPD cases, that approached statistical significance (64·8 ± 7·4 vs 67·1 ± 6·2, p = 0·05). There were no differences in the retinal arteriovenous ratio, the carotid intima-media thickness, or the number of carotid plaques, between cases and controls. Fibrinogen values were higher in the COPD group (378·4 ± 69·6 vs 352·2 ± 45·6 mg/dL, p = 0·01) and mean nocturnal oxygen saturation values were lower for COPD patients (89·0 ± 4·07 vs 92·3 ± 2·2%, p < 0·0001).

interpretationHypertension induced by sympathetic overactivity does not seem to be a mechanism that could explain the association between COPD and cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

AgedBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCardiovascular DiseasesCase-Control StudiesCatecholaminesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRisk FactorsCatecholamines

Identifiers

PMID27362479
PMCPMC4928916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.