Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27362262›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli from Pigs in Organic and Conventional Farming in Four European Countries.

Julia Österberg, Anne Wingstrand, Annette Nygaard Jensen, Annaelle Kerouanton, Veronica Cibin, Lisa Barco, Martine Denis, Sören Aabo, Björn Bengtsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Closely RelatedVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Genomic Insights of Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. 2002-2022 Quinolone Resistance inVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Effect of Antimicrobial Peptide (PA-13) onAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antimicrobial Resistance in CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Julia ÖsterbergNational Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4859-4269
Anne WingstrandNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annette Nygaard JensenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annaelle KerouantonFrench Agency for Food, Environment and Occupational Health Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Veronica CibinIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Legnaro, Italy.
Lisa BarcoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Legnaro, Italy.
Martine DenisFrench Agency for Food, Environment and Occupational Health Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Sören AaboNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Björn BengtssonNational Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Technical University of Denmark · DKIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITSécurité et Qualité des Produits d'Origine Végétale · FRSwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic pig production differs in many ways from conventional production of pigs, e.g., in antibiotic use, herd structure, feeding regimes, access to outdoor areas and space allowance per pig. This study investigated if these differences result in a lower occurrence of antibiotic resistance in organic slaughter pigs in Denmark, France, Italy and Sweden. Samples were taken from the colon content and/or faeces and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ten antibiotics were determined in isolates of Escherichia coli. In addition, the proportion of tetracycline (TET) resistant E. coli in colon content and/or faeces from individual pigs was determined. In all four countries the percentage resistance to ampicillin, streptomycin, sulphonamides or trimethoprim was significantly lower in E. coli from organic pigs. In France and Italy, the percentage of isolates resistant to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid or gentamicin was also significantly lower in the E. coli from organic pigs. Resistance to cefotaxime, was not found in any country. The percentage of E. coli isolates resistant to TET as well as the proportion of TET-resistant E. coli was significantly lower in organic than in conventional pigs, except in Sweden where TET-resistance was equally low in both production types. There were also differences between countries within production type in the percentage resistance to individual antibiotics as well as the proportion of TET-resistant E. coli with lower median proportions in Sweden and Denmark compared to France and Italy. The study shows that in each of the four countries resistance in intestinal E. coli was less common in organic than in conventional pigs, but that there were also large differences in resistance between countries within each production type, indicating that both country- and production-specific factors influence the occurrence of resistance.

Indexed as

AgricultureAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEuropeFecesSwineAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID27362262
PMCPMC4928804
OpenAlexW2469491203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.