Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358934›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2016

Impact of uncertainty in longitudinal T1 measurements on quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Madhava P Aryal, Thomas L Chenevert, Yue Cao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MRI Mapping of Renal TMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madhava P Aryal
Thomas L Chenevert
Yue Cao
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

QUANTITATION OF HUMAN BRAIN TUMOR THERAPY RESPONSE BY MRP01CA085878 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROSS, BRIAN D. · 2001 to 2017
$31.9M
Quantitative DW-MRI for Early Breast Cancer Treatment Response AssessmentU01CA166104 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHENEVERT, THOMAS L, GALBAN, CRAIG J · 2012 to 2019
$4.1M
Quantitative MRI models of HN Cancers for Physiological Adaption of RTU01CA183848 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CAO, YUE · 2014 to 2019
$2.0M
Functional Imaging as a Biomaker for Neurotoxicity After Brain IrradiationR01NS064973 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CAO, YUE · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA085878NCI NIH HHS P01 CA85878NCI NIH HHS U01 CA166104NCI NIH HHS U01 CA183848NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the uncertainty in T1 measurement, by estimating the repeatability coefficient (RC) from two repeated scans, in normal appearing brain tissues employing two different T1 mapping methods. All brain MRI scans were performed on a 3 T MR scanner in 10 patients who had low grade/benign tumors and partial brain radiation therapy (RT) without chemotherapy, at pre-RT, 3 weeks into RT, end RT (6 weeks) and 11, 33, and 85 weeks after RT. T1-weighted images were acquired using (1) a spoiled gradient echo sequence with two flip angles (2FA: 5° and 15°) and (2) a progressive saturation recovery sequence (pSR) with five different TR values (100-2000 ms). Manually drawn volumes of interest (VOIs) included left and right normal putamen and thalamus in gray matter, and frontal and parietal white matter, which were distant from tumors and received a total of accumulated radiation doses less than 5 Gy at 3 weeks. No significant changes or even trends in mean T1 from pre-RT to 3 weeks into RT in these VOIs (p ≥ 0.11, Wilcoxon sign test) allowed us to calculate the repeatability statistics of between-subject means of squares, within-subject means of squares, F-score, and RC. The 2FA method produced RCs in the range of (9.7-11.7)% in gray matter and (12.2-14.5)% in white matter; while the pSR method led to RCs ranging from 10.9 to 17.9% in gray matter and 7.5 to 10.3% in white matter. The overall mean (±SD) RCs produced by the two methods, 12.0 (±1.6)% for 2FA and 12.0 (±3.8)% for pSR, were not significantly different (p = 0.97). A similar repeatability in T1 measurement produced by the time efficient 2FA method compared with the time consuming pSR method demonstrates that the 2FA method is desirable to integrate into dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for rapid acquisition.

Indexed as

UncertaintyAdultBrainContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID27358934
PMCPMC4929815
OpenAlexW2257195584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.