ArticleStem cell investigation2015
Quantitative analyses of myelofibrosis by determining hydroxyproline.
Article in Stem cell investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and mechanism of metformin in animal models of pulmonary fibrosis: A preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- miR-543 regulates the epigenetic landscape of myelofibrosis by targeting TET1 and TET2.JCI insight · 2020Article
- Efficacy of ALK5 inhibition in myelofibrosis.JCI insight · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are blood malignancies manifested in increased production of red blood cells, white blood cells, and/or platelets. Myelofibrosis is a subtype of MPNs characterized by the formation of scar-like tissues in the bone marrow due to abnormal hematopoiesis. It is considered a disease of both hematopoietic stem cells and stem cell niches. Patients with myelofibrosis have very poor prognosis, and there is no effective treatment so far. Myelofibrosis has routinely been detected by using histochemical staining methods which produce qualitative rather than quantitative results. In this study, we developed a quantitative assay of bone marrow myelofibrosis in JAK2V617F transgenic mice by determining hydroxyproline.
methodsThe JAK2V617F transgenic mice's tissue was collected to detect the bone marrow myelofibrosis. Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism program. Differences of samples between two groups were accessed using t tests. P values less than 0.05 (2-tailed) were considered significantly different.
resultsWe developed a quantitative method for detecting myelofibrosis by analyzing the content of hydroxyproline, a modified amino acid largely restricted to collagen which forms the fibrotic structure in bone marrow tissues. Our study also demonstrated age-dependent development of bone marrow myelofibrosis in JAK2V617F transgenic mice.
conclusionsIn the present study, we have developed a new method for detecting bone marrow myelofibrosis by analyzing hydroxyproline contents. The method is highly sensitive and accurate. It provides more accurate, representative, and quantitative information than histochemical analyses. We believe that this method should find wide applications for analyzing the progression of myelofibrosis and efficacy of drug treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.