ReviewStem cell investigation2014
Oncolytic virus as a cancer stem cell killer: progress and challenges.
Review in Stem cell investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of oncolytic virotherapy and viral oncogenes in the cancer stem cells: a review of virus in cancer stem cells.Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- NSCs are permissive to oncolyticOncotarget · 2020Article
- Novel Chimeric Poxvirus CF17 Improves Survival in a Murine Model of Intraperitoneal Ovarian Cancer Metastasis.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2020Article
- Neural Stem Cells Improve the Delivery of Oncolytic Chimeric Orthopoxvirus in a Metastatic Ovarian Cancer Model.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2020Article
- Enhanced Delivery of Oncolytic Adenovirus by Neural Stem Cells for Treatment of Metastatic Ovarian Cancer.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncolytic viruses (OVs), which were discovered more than one century ago, have been used in multiple clinical trials for cancer therapy. OVs specifically target cancer cells when sparing normal cells by exploiting biochemical differences between normal and tumor cells. Hence oncolytic virotherapy is more specific at targeting cancer cells compared with conventional anti-cancer therapy. Apart from the lack of specificity, conventional anti-cancer therapies also often witness relapse and incomplete cure of cancer. One hypothesis explaining this phenomenon is that a subpopulation of cancer cells, known as cancer stem cells (CSCs), are resistant to conventional therapies, possibly due to its self-renewal and differentiation abilities. With the discovery of CSCs, researchers have been trying to explain whether OVs are well suited to eliminate CSCs. Two explanations for postulating OVs as ideal candidates for cancer therapy have been proposed: first, OVs are not subject to the same mechanisms responsible for chemotherapy and radiation resistance; second, viruses could be harnessed to express therapeutic transgenes that specifically target the features unique to CSCs or the properties CSCs rely on for self-renewal and differentiation. Indeed, initial studies suggest that OVs could effectively target CSCs in multiple tumor types. The focus of this review is to highlight recent studies related to the application of OVs on targeting CSCs, based on which, the challenges and perspectives for further research in this field will also be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.