Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358868›Full record

ReviewStem cell investigation2014

Oncolytic virus as a cancer stem cell killer: progress and challenges.

Jingzhen Ding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingzhen DingDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses (OVs), which were discovered more than one century ago, have been used in multiple clinical trials for cancer therapy. OVs specifically target cancer cells when sparing normal cells by exploiting biochemical differences between normal and tumor cells. Hence oncolytic virotherapy is more specific at targeting cancer cells compared with conventional anti-cancer therapy. Apart from the lack of specificity, conventional anti-cancer therapies also often witness relapse and incomplete cure of cancer. One hypothesis explaining this phenomenon is that a subpopulation of cancer cells, known as cancer stem cells (CSCs), are resistant to conventional therapies, possibly due to its self-renewal and differentiation abilities. With the discovery of CSCs, researchers have been trying to explain whether OVs are well suited to eliminate CSCs. Two explanations for postulating OVs as ideal candidates for cancer therapy have been proposed: first, OVs are not subject to the same mechanisms responsible for chemotherapy and radiation resistance; second, viruses could be harnessed to express therapeutic transgenes that specifically target the features unique to CSCs or the properties CSCs rely on for self-renewal and differentiation. Indeed, initial studies suggest that OVs could effectively target CSCs in multiple tumor types. The focus of this review is to highlight recent studies related to the application of OVs on targeting CSCs, based on which, the challenges and perspectives for further research in this field will also be discussed.

Indexed as

Cancer stem cells (CSCs)cancer therapyoncolytic viruses (OVs)

Identifiers

PMID27358868
PMCPMC4923634
OpenAlexW2210097497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.