Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358824›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental reproductive medicine2016

Epigenetics: A key paradigm in reproductive health.

Neha Bunkar, Neelam Pathak, Nirmal Kumar Lohiya, Pradyumna Kumar Mishra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research Progress of Histone Deacetylase and Its Inhibitors in Endometriosis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathomechanisms of Prenatally Programmed Adult Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Nanotechnology in reproductive medicine: Opportunities for clinical translation.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. AMPK: An Epigenetic Landscape Modulator.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. OXIDATIVE STRESS IN REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY.Current opinion in toxicology · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. International journal of biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neha BunkarTranslational Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Dr. Hari Singh Central University, Sagar, India.
Neelam PathakTranslational Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Dr. Hari Singh Central University, Sagar, India.; Reproductive Physiology Laboratory, Centre for Advanced Studies, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Nirmal Kumar LohiyaReproductive Physiology Laboratory, Centre for Advanced Studies, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Pradyumna Kumar MishraTranslational Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Dr. Hari Singh Central University, Sagar, India.; Department of Molecular Biology, National Institute for Research in Environmental Health (ICMR), Bhopal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that there is a heritable element of susceptibility to chronic human ailments, yet there is compelling evidence that some components of such heritability are transmitted through non-genetic factors. Due to the complexity of reproductive processes, identifying the inheritance patterns of these factors is not easy. But little doubt exists that besides the genomic backbone, a range of epigenetic cues affect our genetic programme. The inter-generational transmission of epigenetic marks is believed to operate via four principal means that dramatically differ in their information content: DNA methylation, histone modifications, microRNAs and nucleosome positioning. These epigenetic signatures influence the cellular machinery through positive and negative feedback mechanisms either alone or interactively. Understanding how these mechanisms work to activate or deactivate parts of our genetic programme not only on a day-to-day basis but also over generations is an important area of reproductive health research.

Indexed as

DNA methylationEpigenomicsHistone codeMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID27358824
PMCPMC4925870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.