ArticleMolecular autism2016
Data from the Baby Siblings Research Consortium confirm and specify the nature of the female protective effect in autism: A commentary on Messinger et al.
Article in Molecular autism, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elevated Polygenic Burden for Autism Spectrum Disorder Is Associated With the Broad Autism Phenotype in Mothers of Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder.Biological psychiatry · 2021Article
- The social brain in female autism: a structural imaging study of twins.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020Article
- Early behavioral indices of inherited liability to autism.Pediatric research · 2019Review
- Opposite Expression Patterns ofFrontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
- Whole-genome sequencing in a family with twin boys with autism and intellectual disability suggests multimodal polygenic risk.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2018Article
- Deconstructing autism: from unitary syndrome to contributory developmental endophenotypes.International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) · 2018Review
- Postzygotic single-nucleotide mosaicisms contribute to the etiology of autism spectrum disorder and autistic traits and the origin of mutations.Human mutation · 2017Article
- Possible sexually dimorphic role of miRNA and other sncRNA in ASD brain.Molecular autism · 2017Article
- Commentary: sex difference differences? A reply to Constantino.Molecular autism · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Sibling recurrence data from the Baby Siblings Research Consortium (BSRC) recapitulate results from very large clinical family studies that demonstrate the absence of the Carter effect and provide clarification of the nature of the female protective effect in ASD. This legacy prospective data collection confirmed marked differences in the proportions of males versus females who lie along deviant trajectories of social development in the setting of inherited liability to autism--a phenomenon which defines the female protective effect--and demonstrate that among affected children, sex differences are modest and homologous to those observed among non-ASD children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.