Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358661›Full record

ReviewCurrent fungal infection reports

Point of Care Testing for the Diagnosis of Fungal Infections: Are We There Yet?

Juergen Prattes, Sven Heldt, Susanne Eigl, Martin Hoenigl

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current fungal infection reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Dot Immunobinding Assay for the Rapid Serodetection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biosensors and Diagnostics for Fungal Detection.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Outbreak of Severe Histoplasmosis Among Tunnel Workers-Dominican Republic, 2015.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juergen PrattesSection of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036 Graz, Austria ; CBmed - Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine, Graz, Austria.
Sven HeldtDivision of Pulmonology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Susanne EiglDivision of Pulmonology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martin HoeniglSection of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036 Graz, Austria ; CBmed - Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine, Graz, Austria ; Division of Pulmonology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria ; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA USA.
Medical University of Graz · ATCenter For Biomarker Research In Medicine · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic tools for invasive fungal infections have continuously improved within the last decades. Nowadays, cultural methods, antigen testing, and molecular tests, such as polymerase chain reaction, are widely used. These methods, however, are accompanied with different limitations as various availability, various turnaround time or high costs. A new generation of point-of-care test has shown promising results in various studies and may overcome some of these limitations. We therefore reviewed the literature for the most promising new point-of-care tests for invasive aspergillosis (

Indexed as

AspergillusCryptococcusDiagnosisDiagnostic toolsFungal infectionsHistoplasmaInvasive fungal infectionsLateral-flow devicePoint-of-careReview

Identifiers

PMID27358661
PMCPMC4896970
OpenAlexW2322977900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.