Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358618›Full record

Observational studyAfrican health sciences2016

A demonstration of mobile phone deployment to support the treatment of acutely ill children under five in Bushenyi district, Uganda.

Jerome Kabakyenga, Celestine Barigye, Jennifer Brenner, Samuel Maling, Denise Buchner, Alberto Nettle-Aquirre, Nalini Singhal, Teddy Kyomuhangi, David Tumusiime, Janet Finch and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in African health sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Strengthening Delivery of Health Services Using Digital Devices.Global health, science and practice · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Health system strengthening using aFrontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluating mobile solutions of integrated Community Case Management (iCCM): Making the final connection.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jerome KabakyengaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda.
Celestine BarigyeMinistry of Health, Uganda.
Jennifer BrennerFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary.
Samuel MalingMbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda.
Denise BuchnerFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary.
Alberto Nettle-AquirreFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary.
Nalini SinghalFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary.
Teddy KyomuhangiMbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda.
David TumusiimeMbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda.
Janet FinchChild & Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia.
Stuart MacLeodChild & Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia.
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UGUniversity of Calgary · CAFamily Research Institute · USMinistry of Health · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenefits of mobile phone deployment for children <5 in low-resource settings remain unproven. The target population of the current demonstration study in Bushenyi District, Uganda, presented with acute fever, pneumonia, or diarrhoea and were treated by community health workers (CHWs) providing integrated community case management (iCCM).

methodsAn observational study was conducted in five parishes (47 villages) served by CHWs well versed in iCCM with supplemental training in mobile phone use. Impact was assessed by quantitative measures and qualitative evaluation through household surveys, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews.

resultsCHWs in targeted sites improved child healthcare through mobile phone use coupled with iCCM. Of acutely ill children, 92.6% were correctly managed. Significant improvements in clinical outcomes compared to those obtained by CHWs with enhanced iCCM training alone were unproven in this limited demonstration. Nonetheless, qualitative evaluation showed gains in treatment planning, supply management, and logistical efficiency. Provider confidence and communications were enhanced as was ease and accuracy of record keeping.

conclusionMobile phones appear synergistic with iCCM to bolster basic supportive care for acutely ill children provided by CHWs. The full impact of expanded mobile phone deployment warrants further evaluation prior to scaling up in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneAdultCase ManagementChildChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersDiarrheaEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalariaPneumoniaProgram DevelopmentBushenyi districtill children under fivemobile phone deploymentUganda

Identifiers

PMID27358618
PMCPMC4915404
OpenAlexW2386448667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.