Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358562›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2016

Impairments of spatial learning and memory following intrahippocampal injection in rats of 3-mercaptopropionic acid-modified CdTe quantum dots and molecular mechanisms.

Tianshu Wu, Keyu He, Shengjun Ang, Jiali Ying, Shihan Zhang, Ting Zhang, Yuying Xue, Meng Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A Review of in vivo Toxicity of Quantum Dots in Animal Models.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Combined acupuncture andNeural regeneration research · 2018
    Article
  10. Impact of nanoparticles on neuron biology: current research trends.International journal of nanomedicine · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tianshu WuKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Keyu HeKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Shengjun AngKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Jiali YingKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Shihan ZhangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Ting ZhangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Yuying XueKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Meng TangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Southeast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of nanotechnology, quantum dots (QDs) as advanced nanotechnology products have been widely used in neuroscience, including basic neurological studies and diagnosis or therapy for neurological disorders, due to their superior optical properties. In recent years, there has been intense concern regarding the toxicity of QDs, with a growing number of studies. However, knowledge of neurotoxic consequences of QDs applied in living organisms is lagging behind their development, even if several studies have attempted to evaluate the toxicity of QDs on neural cells. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adverse effects of intrahippocampal injection in rats of 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA)-modified CdTe QDs and underlying mechanisms. First of all, we observed impairments in learning efficiency and spatial memory in the MPA-modified CdTe QD-treated rats by using open-field and Y-maze tests, which could be attributed to pathological changes and disruption of ultrastructure of neurons and synapses in the hippocampus. In order to find the mechanisms causing these effects, transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq), an advanced technology, was used to gain the potentially molecular targets of MPA-modified CdTe QDs. According to ample data from RNA-seq, we chose the signaling pathways of PI3K-Akt and MPAK-ERK to do a thorough investigation, because they play important roles in synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, and spatial memory. The data demonstrated that phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt), p-ERK1/2, and c-FOS signal transductions in the hippocampus of rats were involved in the mechanism underlying spatial learning and memory impairments caused by 3.5 nm MPA-modified CdTe QDs.

Indexed as

3-Mercaptopropionic AcidAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCadmium CompoundsGene ExpressionHippocampusInjectionsLong-Term PotentiationMaleMemoryNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesQuantum DotsRats, WistarSignal Transduction3-Mercaptopropionic AcidCadmium Compoundscadmium telluridePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesTelluriumCdTe quantum dotsc-FOSlearning and memorynanotoxicologyneurotoxicologyp-AKTp-ERK1/2RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID27358562
PMCPMC4912344
OpenAlexW2413898433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.