Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358454›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Collective Activity of Many Bistable Assemblies Reproduces Characteristic Dynamics of Multistable Perception.

Robin Cao, Alexander Pastukhov, Maurizio Mattia, Jochen Braun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Accumulating Neural Signal Underlying Binocular Rivalry Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuronal population dynamics during motor plan cancellation in nonhuman primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perceptual rivalry with vibrotactile stimuli.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cortical computations via metastable activity.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robin CaoInstitute of Biology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy, and.
Alexander PastukhovInstitute of Psychology, Otto-Friedrich-University, 96047 Bamberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-8591
Maurizio MattiaIstituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2356-4509
Jochen BraunInstitute of Biology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany, Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany, jochen.braun@ovgu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8886-078X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe timing of perceptual decisions depends on both deterministic and stochastic factors, as the gradual accumulation of sensory evidence (deterministic) is contaminated by sensory and/or internal noise (stochastic). When human observers view multistable visual displays, successive episodes of stochastic accumulation culminate in repeated reversals of visual appearance. Treating reversal timing as a "first-passage time" problem, we ask how the observed timing densities constrain the underlying stochastic accumulation. Importantly, mean reversal times (i.e., deterministic factors) differ enormously between displays/observers/stimulation levels, whereas the variance and skewness of reversal times (i.e., stochastic factors) keep characteristic proportions of the mean. What sort of stochastic process could reproduce this highly consistent "scaling property?" Here we show that the collective activity of a finite population of bistable units (i.e., a generalized Ehrenfest process) quantitatively reproduces all aspects of the scaling property of multistable phenomena, in contrast to other processes under consideration (Poisson, Wiener, or Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process). The postulated units express the spontaneous dynamics of attractor assemblies transitioning between distinct activity states. Plausible candidates are cortical columns, or clusters of columns, as they are preferentially connected and spontaneously explore a restricted repertoire of activity states. Our findings suggests that perceptual representations are granular, probabilistic, and operate far from equilibrium, thereby offering a suitable substrate for statistical inference. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Spontaneous reversals of high-level perception, so-called multistable perception, conform to highly consistent and characteristic statistics, constraining plausible neural representations. We show that the observed perceptual dynamics would be reproduced quantitatively by a finite population of distinct neural assemblies, each with locally bistable activity, operating far from the collective equilibrium (generalized Ehrenfest process). Such a representation would be consistent with the intrinsic stochastic dynamics of neocortical activity, which is dominated by preferentially connected assemblies, such as cortical columns or clusters of columns. We predict that local neuron assemblies will express bistable dynamics, with spontaneous active-inactive transitions, whenever they contribute to high-level perception.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsAction PotentialsBrainFemaleHumansMaleNeuronsPhotic StimulationStochastic ProcessesVisual Perceptionattractor cell assembliesbirth-death processcortical columnsfirst-passage timemultistable perceptionscaling property

Identifiers

PMID27358454
PMCPMC6604901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.