Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358376›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomaterials applications2016

Microsphere-based scaffolds encapsulating chondroitin sulfate or decellularized cartilage.

Vineet Gupta, Kevin M Tenny, Marilyn Barragan, Cory J Berkland, Michael S Detamore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomaterials applications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Effect of bone morphogenetic protein 7/poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres on theZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018
    Article
  6. Microsphere-Based Scaffolds in Regenerative Engineering.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vineet GuptaBioengineering Graduate Program, University of Kansas, USA.
Kevin M TennyDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, USA.
Marilyn BarraganDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, USA.
Cory J BerklandDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, USA Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, USA.
Michael S DetamoreBioengineering Graduate Program, University of Kansas, USA Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, USA detamore@ku.edu.
University of Kansas · US

Funding

MBRS IMSD PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSASR25GM062232 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI CARTWRIGHT, PAULYN, HANSON, PAUL R. · 2001 to 2018
$6.9M
Gradient-based strategy for osteochondral regenerationR01AR056347 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DETAMORE, MICHAEL S. · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056347NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM062232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular matrix materials such as decellularized cartilage (DCC) and chondroitin sulfate (CS) may be attractive chondrogenic materials for cartilage regeneration. The goal of the current study was to investigate the effects of encapsulation of DCC and CS in homogeneous microsphere-based scaffolds, and to test the hypothesis that encapsulation of these extracellular matrix materials would induce chondrogenesis of rat bone marrow stromal cells. Four different types of homogeneous scaffolds were fabricated from microspheres of poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid): Blank (poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) only; negative control), transforming growth factor-β3 encapsulated (positive control), DCC encapsulated, and CS encapsulated. These scaffolds were then seeded with rat bone marrow stromal cells and cultured for 6 weeks. The DCC and CS encapsulation altered the morphological features of the microspheres, resulting in higher porosities in these groups. Moreover, the mechanical properties of the scaffolds were impacted due to differences in the degree of sintering, with the CS group exhibiting the highest compressive modulus. Biochemical evidence suggested a mitogenic effect of DCC and CS encapsulation on rat bone marrow stromal cells with the matrix synthesis boosted primarily by the inherently present extracellular matrix components. An important finding was that the cell seeded CS and DCC groups at week 6 had up to an order of magnitude higher glycosaminoglycan contents than their acellular counterparts. Gene expression results indicated a suppressive effect of DCC and CS encapsulation on rat bone marrow stromal cell chondrogenesis with differences in gene expression patterns existing between the DCC and CS groups. Overall, DCC and CS were easily included in microsphere-based scaffolds; however, there is a requirement to further refine their concentrations to achieve the differentiation profiles we seek in vitro.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsCartilageCell DifferentiationCell-Free SystemCells, CulturedChondrocytesChondrogenesisChondroitin SulfatesExtracellular MatrixMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMicrospheresRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyChondroitin Sulfatescartilage regenerationChondroitin sulfatedecellularized cartilagemicrosphere-based scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID27358376
PMCPMC5179140
OpenAlexW2472895322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.