Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358358›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Evaluation of the C6 Lyme Enzyme Immunoassay for the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Children and Adolescents.

Susan C Lipsett, John A Branda, Alexander J McAdam, Louis Vernacchio, Caroline D Gordon, Catherine R Gordon, Lise E Nigrovic

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Evaluation of 2 ELISAs to determineJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Modified two-tiered testing algorithm for Lyme disease serology: the Canadian context.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Community Study ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evaluation of Modified 2-Tiered Serodiagnostic Testing Algorithms for Early Lyme Disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan C LipsettDivision of Emergency Medicine.
John A BrandaDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Alexander J McAdamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital.
Louis VernacchioDivision of General Pediatrics Pediatric Physicians' Organization at Children's, Brookline, Massachusetts.
Caroline D GordonDivision of Emergency Medicine.
Catherine R GordonDivision of Emergency Medicine.
Lise E NigrovicDivision of Emergency Medicine.
Boston Children's Health Physicians · USBoston Children's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe commercially-available C6 Lyme enzyme immunoassay (EIA) has been approved to replace the standard whole-cell sonicate EIA as a first-tier test for the diagnosis of Lyme disease and has been suggested as a stand-alone diagnostic. However, the C6 EIA has not been extensively studied in pediatric patients undergoing evaluation for Lyme disease.

methodsWe collected discarded serum samples from children and adolescents (aged ≤21 years) undergoing conventional 2-tiered testing for Lyme disease at a single hospital-based clinical laboratory located in an area endemic for Lyme disease. We performed a C6 EIA on all collected specimens, followed by a supplemental immunoblot if the C6 EIA result was positive but the whole-cell sonicate EIA result was negative. We defined a case of Lyme disease as either a clinician-diagnosed erythema migrans lesion or a positive standard 2-tiered serologic result in a patient with symptoms compatible with Lyme disease. We then compared the performance of the C6 EIA alone and as a first-tier test followed by immunoblot, with that of standard 2-tiered serology for the diagnosis of Lyme disease.

resultsOf the 944 specimens collected, 114 (12%) were from patients with Lyme disease. The C6 EIA alone had sensitivity similar to that of standard 2-tiered testing (79.8% vs 81.6% for standard 2-tiered testing; P = .71) with slightly lower specificity (94.2% vs 98.8% 2; P < .002). Addition of a supplemental immunoblot improved the specificity of the C6 EIA to 98.6%.

conclusionsFor children and adolescents undergoing evaluation for Lyme disease, the C6 EIA could guide initial clinical decision making, although a supplemental immunoblot should still be performed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntibodies, BacterialBorrelia burgdorferiChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesLyme DiseaseMaleSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialC6Lyme diseaseLyme disease diagnosticspediatrics

Identifiers

PMID27358358
PMCPMC5019286
OpenAlexW2468702102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.