Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358314›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Reduced frontal theta oscillations indicate altered crossmodal prediction error processing in schizophrenia.

Yadira Roa Romero, Julian Keil, Johanna Balz, Jürgen Gallinat, Daniel Senkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Memory Load Alters Perception-Related Neural Oscillations during Multisensory Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Integrative Model of Effortful Control.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yadira Roa RomeroDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Hospital, St. Hedwig Hospital, Berlin, Germany; and yadira.roa-romero@charite.de.
Julian KeilDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Hospital, St. Hedwig Hospital, Berlin, Germany; and.
Johanna BalzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Hospital, St. Hedwig Hospital, Berlin, Germany; and.
Jürgen GallinatDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Daniel SenkowskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Hospital, St. Hedwig Hospital, Berlin, Germany; and.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our brain generates predictions about forthcoming stimuli and compares predicted with incoming input. Failures in predicting events might contribute to hallucinations and delusions in schizophrenia (SZ). When a stimulus violates prediction, neural activity that reflects prediction error (PE) processing is found. While PE processing deficits have been reported in unisensory paradigms, it is unknown whether SZ patients (SZP) show altered crossmodal PE processing. We measured high-density electroencephalography and applied source estimation approaches to investigate crossmodal PE processing generated by audiovisual speech. In SZP and healthy control participants (HC), we used an established paradigm in which high- and low-predictive visual syllables were paired with congruent or incongruent auditory syllables. We examined crossmodal PE processing in SZP and HC by comparing differences in event-related potentials and neural oscillations between incongruent and congruent high- and low-predictive audiovisual syllables. In both groups event-related potentials between 206 and 250 ms were larger in high- compared with low-predictive syllables, suggesting intact audiovisual incongruence detection in the auditory cortex of SZP. The analysis of oscillatory responses revealed theta-band (4-7 Hz) power enhancement in high- compared with low-predictive syllables between 230 and 370 ms in the frontal cortex of HC but not SZP. Thus aberrant frontal theta-band oscillations reflect crossmodal PE processing deficits in SZ. The present study suggests a top-down multisensory processing deficit and highlights the role of dysfunctional frontal oscillations for the SZ psychopathology.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyTheta RhythmAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalEvoked PotentialsFacial RecognitionFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMotion PerceptionNeuropsychological TestsSchizophreniaSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSpeech PerceptionThinkingaudiovisual speechmultisensory processingneural synchronyoscillatory activitypredictive coding

Identifiers

PMID27358314
PMCPMC5040384
OpenAlexW2468652375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.