Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27358168›Full record

ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2016

Probing the minimal determinants of zinc binding with computational protein design.

Sharon L Guffy, Bryan S Der, Brian Kuhlman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Zero-shot design of abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Engineering glycoside hydrolase stability by the introduction of zinc binding.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2018
    Article
  10. Rapid Sampling of Hydrogen Bond Networks for Computational Protein Design.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sharon L GuffyDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7260, USA.
Bryan S DerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7260, USA.
Brian KuhlmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7260, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008570 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KUHLMAN, BRIAN A, SLEP, KEVIN C · 1995 to 2022
$5.1M
Computational Methods for Requirement-Driven Protein DesignR01GM117968 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KUHLMAN, BRIAN A · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117968NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structure-based protein design tests our understanding of the minimal determinants of protein structure and function. Previous studies have demonstrated that placing zinc binding amino acids (His, Glu, Asp or Cys) near each other in a folded protein in an arrangement predicted to be tetrahedral is often sufficient to achieve binding to zinc. However, few designs have been characterized with high-resolution structures. Here, we use X-ray crystallography, binding studies and mutation analysis to evaluate three alternative strategies for designing zinc binding sites with the molecular modeling program Rosetta. While several of the designs were observed to bind zinc, crystal structures of two designs reveal binding configurations that differ from the design model. In both cases, the modeling did not accurately capture the presence or absence of second-shell hydrogen bonds critical in determining binding-site structure. Efforts to more explicitly design second-shell hydrogen bonds were largely unsuccessful as evidenced by mutation analysis and low expression of proteins engineered with extensive primary and secondary networks. Our results suggest that improved methods for designing interaction networks will be needed for creating metal binding sites with high accuracy.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularBinding SitesCrystallography, X-RayHydrogen BondingPoint MutationProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringProteinsZincProteinsZincmetalloproteinsprotein designRosettazinc binding

Identifiers

PMID27358168
PMCPMC4955873
OpenAlexW2464123328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.