Observational studyImplementation science : IS2016
A national evaluation of a dissemination and implementation initiative to enhance primary care practice capacity and improve cardiovascular disease care: the ESCALATES study protocol.
Observational study in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02560428 (Evaluating System Change to Advance Learning and Take Evidence to Scale), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating System Change to Advance Learning and Take Evidence to Scale (ESCALATES)
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Practice Facilitation in Primary Care on Chronic Disease Care Processes and Outcomes: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- The LEAP Program: Quality Improvement Training to Address Team Readiness Gaps Identified by Implementation Science Findings.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Trial
- A Randomized Trial of External Practice Support to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care.Annals of family medicine · 2019Trial
- Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices.BMC family practice · 2019Trial
- Quality of Cardiovascular Disease Care in Small Urban Practices.Annals of family medicine · 2018Trial
- Heart Healthy Ohio Initiative: A Statewide Cooperative to Improve Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Leveraging machine learning approach to identify relationships between practice facilitation strategies and practice characteristics based on the implementation research logic model.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Differences in Use of Clinical Decision Support Tools and Implementation of Aspirin, Blood Pressure Control, Cholesterol Management, and Smoking Cessation Quality Metrics in Small Practices by Race and Sex.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Applying User-Centered Design and Implementation Science to the Early-Stage Development of a Telehealth-Enhanced Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Quality Improvement Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- How does facilitation in healthcare work? Using mechanism mapping to illuminate the black box of a meta-implementation strategy.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Estimating the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction of a Quality Improvement Initiative in Primary Care: Findings from EvidenceNOW.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2023Article
- Association of Clinician Practice Ownership With Ability of Primary Care Practices to Improve Quality Without Increasing Burnout.JAMA health forum · 2023Article
- How Type of Practice Ownership Affects Participation with Quality Improvement External Facilitation: Findings from EvidenceNOW.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Barriers to Implementing Cardiovascular Risk Calculation in Primary Care: Alignment With the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021Article
- Exemplary Practices in Cardiovascular Care: Results on Clinical Quality Measures from the EvidenceNOW Southwest Cooperative.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Development of competency model for family physicians against the background of 'internet plus healthcare' in China: a mixed methods study.Human resources for health · 2020Article
- Using Electronic Health Records to Measure Quality Improvement Efforts: Findings from a Large Practice Facilitation Initiative.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) launched the EvidenceNOW Initiative to rapidly disseminate and implement evidence-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) preventive care in smaller primary care practices. AHRQ funded eight grantees (seven regional Cooperatives and one independent national evaluation) to participate in EvidenceNOW. The national evaluation examines quality improvement efforts and outcomes for more than 1500 small primary care practices (restricted to those with fewer than ten physicians per clinic). Examples of external support include practice facilitation, expert consultation, performance feedback, and educational materials and activities. This paper describes the study protocol for the EvidenceNOW national evaluation, which is called Evaluating System Change to Advance Learning and Take Evidence to Scale (ESCALATES).
methodsThis prospective observational study will examine the portfolio of EvidenceNOW Cooperatives using both qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data include: online implementation diaries, observation and interviews at Cooperatives and practices, and systematic assessment of context from the perspective of Cooperative team members. Quantitative data include: practice-level performance on clinical quality measures (aspirin prescribing, blood pressure and cholesterol control, and smoking cessation; ABCS) collected by Cooperatives from electronic health records (EHRs); practice and practice member surveys to assess practice capacity and other organizational and structural characteristics; and systematic tracking of intervention delivery. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods analyses will be conducted to examine how Cooperatives organize to provide external support to practices, to compare effectiveness of the dissemination and implementation approaches they implement, and to examine how regional variations and other organization and contextual factors influence implementation and effectiveness. DISCUSSION: ESCALATES is a national evaluation of an ambitious large-scale dissemination and implementation effort focused on transforming smaller primary care practices. Insights will help to inform the design of national health care practice extension systems aimed at supporting practice transformation efforts in the USA. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT02560428 (09/21/15).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.