Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27357932›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2016

A prospective study of angiogenic markers and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Roni T Falk, Annetine Cathrine Staff, Gary Bradwin, S Ananth Karumanchi, Rebecca Troisi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Roni T FalkMetabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20852, USA. falkr@mail.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-5398-761X
Annetine Cathrine StaffWomen and Children's Division, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Gary BradwinClinical and Epidemiologic Research Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
S Ananth KarumanchiDeparments of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Vascular Biology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Rebecca TroisiEpidemiology and Biostatistics Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20852, USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBoston Children's Hospital · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · USOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePro-angiogenic factors are positively associated with breast tumor staging and poorer prognosis, but their role in the etiology of breast cancer has not been assessed.

methodsWe measured serum levels of the pro-angiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF), and placental growth factor (PlGF) and anti-angiogenic soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) in 352 incident breast cancer cases [mean age at diagnosis 67 (range 55-83)] and 352 non-cases in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian screening trial (women enrolled 1993-2001, followed through 2005) matched on age and date of enrollment. Cases were followed on average 4.2 years from blood draw to diagnosis, range 3.9-12.8 years; 53 % were estrogen receptor positive/progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PR+), and 13 % were ER-/PR-. Quartile-specific hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for known breast cancer risk factors. An ordinal variable for the angiogenic markers was used to test for trend in the HR.

resultsComparing the highest to lowest quartile, multivariable HR were 0.90 for VEGF (95 % CI 0.33-2.43, p trend = 0.88), 1.38 for sFlt-1 (95 % CI 0.63-3.04, p trend = 0.63), and 0.62 for PlGF (95 % CI 0.19-2.00, p trend = 0.73). Risk patterns were not altered when all angiogenic markers were included in the model simultaneously, or by restricting analyses to invasive breast cancers, to cases diagnosed two or more years after blood collection or to ER+ tumors.

conclusionsThere was no evidence of an increased breast cancer risk associated with circulating levels of pro-angiogenic markers VEGF and PlGF or a reduced risk with circulating levels of anti-angiogenic marker sFlt-1.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPlacenta Growth FactorPostmenopauseProspective StudiesRisk FactorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1BiomarkersFLT1 protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1AngiogenesisBreast cancer riskPlGFsFlt-1VEGF

Identifiers

PMID27357932
PMCPMC4958123
OpenAlexW2463930936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.