Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27357824›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2016

Proteomic analysis of breast tumors confirms the mRNA intrinsic molecular subtypes using different classifiers: a large-scale analysis of fresh frozen tissue samples.

Sofia Waldemarson, Emila Kurbasic, Morten Krogh, Paolo Cifani, Tord Berggård, Åke Borg, Peter James

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Expression Analysis of Long Non-Coding PCAT-1in Breast Cancer.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sofia WaldemarsonDepartment of Immunotechnology, Lund University, Medicon Village, 223 81, Lund, Sweden.
Emila KurbasicDepartment of Immunotechnology, Lund University, Medicon Village, 223 81, Lund, Sweden.
Morten KroghAmber Biosciences AB, Skrivarevägen 9, 226 57, Lund, Sweden.
Paolo CifaniDepartment of Immunotechnology, Lund University, Medicon Village, 223 81, Lund, Sweden.
Tord BerggårdNovo Nordisk A/S, Lund, Sweden.
Åke BorgDepartment of Oncology, Lund University, Medicon Village, 223 81, Lund, Sweden.
Peter JamesDepartment of Immunotechnology, Lund University, Medicon Village, 223 81, Lund, Sweden. Peter.james@immun.lth.se.
Lund University · SEAlligator Bioscience (Sweden) · SEUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease that is usually characterized by histological parameters such as tumor size, cellular arrangements/rearrangments, necrosis, nuclear grade and the mitotic index, leading to a set of around twenty subtypes. Together with clinical markers such as hormone receptor status, this classification has considerable prognostic value but there is a large variation in patient response to therapy. Gene expression profiling has provided molecular profiles characteristic of distinct subtypes of breast cancer that reflect the divergent cellular origins and degree of progression.

methodsHere we present a large-scale proteomic and transcriptomic profiling study of 477 sporadic and hereditary breast cancer tumors with matching mRNA expression analysis. Unsupervised hierarchal clustering was performed and selected proteins from large-scale tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis were transferred into a highly multiplexed targeted selected reaction monitoring assay to classify tumors using a hierarchal cluster and support vector machine with leave one out cross-validation.

resultsThe subgroups formed upon unsupervised clustering agree very well with groups found at transcriptional level; however, the classifiers (genes or their respective protein products) differ almost entirely between the two datasets. In-depth analysis shows clear differences in pathways unique to each type, which may lie behind their different clinical outcomes. Targeted mass spectrometry analysis and supervised clustering correlate very well with subgroups determined by RNA classification and show convincing agreement with clinical parameters.

conclusionsThis work demonstrates the merits of protein expression profiling for breast cancer stratification. These findings have important implications for the use of genomics and expression analysis for the prediction of protein expression, such as receptor status and drug target expression. The highly multiplexed MS assay is easily implemented in standard clinical chemistry practice, allowing rapid and cheap characterization of tumor tissue suitable for directing the choice of treatment.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingProteomicsBreast NeoplasmsChromatography, LiquidCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyFemaleHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalReproducibility of ResultsRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionSupport Vector MachineTandem Mass SpectrometryTranscriptomeRNA, MessengerBreast cancerMass spectrometryMolecular subtypingProteomicsTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID27357824
PMCPMC4928264
OpenAlexW2474646638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.