Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27357680›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Visualizing in situ translational activity for identifying and sorting slow-growing archaeal-bacterial consortia.

Roland Hatzenpichler, Stephanie A Connon, Danielle Goudeau, Rex R Malmstrom, Tanja Woyke, Victoria J Orphan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Global analysis of protein degradation reveals instability of diverse regulators inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microbial single-cell applications under anoxic conditions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Review

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roland HatzenpichlerDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; hatzenpichler@caltech.edu vorphan@gps.caltech.edu.
Stephanie A ConnonDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125;
Danielle GoudeauJoint Genome Institute, Department of Energy, Walnut Creek, CA 94598.
Rex R MalmstromJoint Genome Institute, Department of Energy, Walnut Creek, CA 94598.
Tanja WoykeJoint Genome Institute, Department of Energy, Walnut Creek, CA 94598.
Victoria J OrphanDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; hatzenpichler@caltech.edu vorphan@gps.caltech.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the biogeochemical roles of microorganisms in the environment, it is important to determine when and under which conditions they are metabolically active. Bioorthogonal noncanonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT) can reveal active cells by tracking the incorporation of synthetic amino acids into newly synthesized proteins. The phylogenetic identity of translationally active cells can be determined by combining BONCAT with rRNA-targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization (BONCAT-FISH). In theory, BONCAT-labeled cells could be isolated with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (BONCAT-FACS) for subsequent genetic analyses. Here, in the first application, to our knowledge, of BONCAT-FISH and BONCAT-FACS within an environmental context, we probe the translational activity of microbial consortia catalyzing the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), a dominant sink of methane in the ocean. These consortia, which typically are composed of anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea (ANME) and sulfate-reducing bacteria, have been difficult to study due to their slow in situ growth rates, and fundamental questions remain about their ecology and diversity of interactions occurring between ANME and associated partners. Our activity-correlated analyses of >16,400 microbial aggregates provide the first evidence, to our knowledge, that AOM consortia affiliated with all five major ANME clades are concurrently active under controlled conditions. Surprisingly, sorting of individual BONCAT-labeled consortia followed by whole-genome amplification and 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed previously unrecognized interactions of ANME with members of the poorly understood phylum Verrucomicrobia This finding, together with our observation that ANME-associated Verrucomicrobia are found in a variety of geographically distinct methane seep environments, suggests a broader range of symbiotic relationships within AOM consortia than previously thought.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyAlkynesAnaerobiosisArchaeaBacteriaFlow CytometryGeologic SedimentsGlycineMethaneMicrobial ConsortiaProtein BiosynthesisStaining and LabelingAlkynesGlycinehomopropargylglycineMethaneactivity-based cell sortingBONCATclick chemistryecophysiologysingle-cell microbiology

Identifiers

PMID27357680
PMCPMC4948357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.