Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27357567›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2016

The Epigenetic Consequences of Paternal Exposure to Environmental Contaminants and Reproductive Toxicants.

Molly S Estill, Stephen A Krawetz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Beyond the looking glass: recent advances in understanding the impact of environmental exposures on neuropsychiatric disease.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Molly S EstillCenter for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. mestill@med.wayne.edu.
Stephen A KrawetzCenter for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. steve@compbio.med.wayne.edu.
Wayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human populations are exposed to a wide spectrum of environmental contaminants, some of which are considered reproductive toxins. The influence of such toxins on the male reproductive system has been investigated extensively in animal models, while epidemiological studies seek to understand the effect of human exposures. The basic tenant of epidemiological studies in male human reproduction is to infer how one or more substances alter the hormonal profile, seminal characteristics, or both. Determining if a substance alters semen quality may not always provide the underlying mechanism. The mechanisms by which toxins may alter human sperm and semen quality are typically examined as a function of hormonal changes and cellular damage. The possibility that more subtle epigenetic alterations underlie some of the reproductive changes has, until recently, received little attention. In this review, we discuss the roles of epigenetics in human spermatogenesis, while considering the impact of reproductive toxicants on the epigenome.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsHumansMalePaternal ExposureSpermatogenesisSpermatozoaEnvironmental PollutantsEpigeneticsIn uteroRNASpermSpermatogenesisTestis

Identifiers

PMID27357567
OpenAlexW2466598046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.