Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27357495›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2016

How home HIV testing and counselling with follow-up support achieves high testing coverage and linkage to treatment and prevention: a qualitative analysis from Uganda.

Norma C Ware, Monique A Wyatt, Stephen Asiimwe, Bosco Turyamureeba, Elioda Tumwesigye, Heidi van Rooyen, Ruanne V Barnabas, Connie L Celum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Norma C WareDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Monique A WyattDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Stephen AsiimweKabwohe Clinical Research Centre, Kabwohe, Uganda.
Bosco TuryamureebaKabwohe Clinical Research Centre, Kabwohe, Uganda.
Elioda TumwesigyeKabwohe Clinical Research Centre, Kabwohe, Uganda.
Heidi van RooyenHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Ruanne V BarnabasDepartment of Global Health, School of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Connie L CelumDepartment of Global Health, School of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Interventions to decrease HIV infectiousness in UgandaRC4AI092552 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CELUM, CONNIE L · 2010 to 2013
$5.6M
NIAID NIH HHS RC4 AI092552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe successes of HIV treatment scale-up and the availability of new prevention tools have raised hopes that the epidemic can finally be controlled and ended. Reduction in HIV incidence and control of the epidemic requires high testing rates at population levels, followed by linkage to treatment or prevention. As effective linkage strategies are identified, it becomes important to understand how these strategies work. We use qualitative data from The Linkages Study, a recent community intervention trial of community-based testing with linkage interventions in sub-Saharan Africa, to show how lay counsellor home HIV testing and counselling (home HTC) with follow-up support leads to linkage to clinic-based HIV treatment and medical male circumcision services.

methodsWe conducted 99 semi-structured individual interviews with study participants and three focus groups with 16 lay counsellors in Kabwohe, Sheema District, Uganda. The participant sample included both HIV+ men and women (N=47) and HIV-uncircumcised men (N=52). Interview and focus group audio-recordings were translated and transcribed. Each transcript was summarized. The summaries were analyzed inductively to identify emergent themes. Thematic concepts were grouped to develop general constructs and framing propositional statements.

resultsTrial participants expressed interest in linking to clinic-based services at testing, but faced obstacles that eroded their initial enthusiasm. Follow-up support by lay counsellors intervened to restore interest and inspire action. Together, home HTC and follow-up support improved morale, created a desire to reciprocate, and provided reassurance that services were trustworthy. In different ways, these functions built links to the health service system. They worked to strengthen individuals' general sense of capability, while making the idea of accessing services more manageable and familiar, thus reducing linkage barriers.

conclusionsHome HTC with follow-up support leads to linkage by building "social bridges," interpersonal connections established and developed through repeated face-to-face contact between counsellors and prospective users of HIV treatment and male circumcision services. Social bridges link communities to the service system, inspiring individuals to overcome obstacles and access care.

Indexed as

AIDS SerodiagnosisCounselingDelivery of Health CareHome Care ServicesAdultCircumcision, MaleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningProspective StudiesUgandacommunity-based HIV servicesfollow-up supportHIV preventionHIV treatmenthome HIV testing and counsellinglay counsellorslinkageUganda

Identifiers

PMID27357495
PMCPMC4928103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.