Trial reportActa orthopaedica2016
Trabecular metal tibial knee component still stable at 10 years.
Trial report in Acta orthopaedica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 6-month migration sufficient for evaluation of total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta orthopaedica · 2023Pooled it
- Tantalum Cementless Versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Level 1 Studies.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Trabecular metal monoblock versus modular tibial trays in total knee arthroplasty: meta-analysis of randomized control trials.International orthopaedics · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- RSA migration of total knee replacements.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Pooled it
- Long-term migration of monoblock vs modular design in uncemented total knee arthroplasty: a secondary report of a randomized trial using radiostereometric analysis.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Trial
- John N. Insall Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Components: Durable and Reliable at a Mean 10-Years Follow-Up.The Journal of arthroplasty · 2023Trial
- Uncemented or cemented femoral components work equally well in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Trial
- Peri-apatite coating decreases uncemented tibial component migration: long-term RSA results of a randomized controlled trial and limitations of short-term results.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Trial
- Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Trial
- A 2-year RSA study of the Vanguard CR total knee system: A randomized controlled trial comparing patient-specific positioning guides with conventional technique.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Trial
- Safe tibial subsidence pattern of a medial pivot knee. An RSA study.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Fixation options for total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive literature review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Review
- New Horizons of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Comparative Analysis of the Tibial Component Migration After Cemented and Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Hydroxyapatite Coating in Two, Five, and Ten Years: A Meta-Analysis.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2023Article
- Uncemented Tibial Fixation Has Comparable Prognostic Outcomes and Safety Versus Cemented Fixation in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Outcomes of trabecular metal total ankle replacement: a longitudinal observational cohort study of 239 consecutive cases from the Swedish Ankle Registry.Acta orthopaedica · 2022Observational
- Article
- Article
- Equivalent 2-year stabilization of uncemented tibial component migration despite higher early migration compared with cemented fixation: an RSA study on 360 total knee arthroplasties.Acta orthopaedica · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose - Total knee replacement (TKR) in younger patients using cemented components has shown inferior results, mainly due to aseptic loosening. Excellent clinical results have been reported with components made of trabecular metal (TM). In a previous report, we have shown stabilization of the TM tibial implants for up to 5 years. In this study, we compared the clinical and RSA results of these uncemented implants with those of cemented implants. Patients and methods - 41 patients (47 knees) aged ≤ 60 years underwent TKR. 22 patients (26 knees) received an uncemented monoblock cruciate-retaining (CR) tibial component (TM) and 19 patients (21 knees) received a cemented NexGen Option CR tibial component. Follow-up examination was done at 10 years, and 16 patients (19 knees) with TM tibial components and 17 patients (18 knees) with cemented tibial components remained for analysis. Results - 1 of 19 TM implants was revised for infection, 2 of 18 cemented components were revised for knee instability, and no revisions were done for loosening. Both types of tibial components migrated in the first 3 months, the TM group to a greater extent than the cemented group. After 3 months, both groups were stable during the next 10 years. Interpretation - The patterns of migration for uncemented TM implants and cemented tibial implants over the first 10 years indicate that they have a good long-term prognosis regarding fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.