Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27357194›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2016

Regional variation of patient behaviour and reasons for consultation in the general practice of Northern Germany: protocol for an observational study.

Ingmar Schäfer, Heike Hansen, Nadine Pohontsch, Laura Bole, Hans-Otto Wagner, Miriam Führ, Dagmar Lühmann, Martin Scherer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02558322 (Regional Variation of Patient Population and Reasons for Consultation in the Primary Medical Care of Northern Germany), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02558322 completednot on this map

Regional Variation of Patient Population and Reasons for Consultation in the Primary Medical Care of Northern Germany

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2015 to 2017Enrolled1,022ConditionsAny Condition Treated in Primary CareArmsPrimary medical care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Patient Input in Regional Healthcare Planning-A Meaningful Contribution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ingmar SchäferDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Heike HansenDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nadine PohontschDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Laura BoleDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hans-Otto WagnerDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Miriam FührDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Dagmar LühmannDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin SchererDepartment of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInappropriate supply and an increasing demand on the healthcare system have been of concern for health policy in Germany for at least 15 years. In the primary care setting, this especially relates to an undersupply of general practitioners (GPs) in the countryside. In addition, there seem to be other regional differences, for example, a difference in accessing primary and secondary care between rural and urban areas. Despite these findings, regional differences in health services have not been studied extensively in Germany. Therefore, this study aims to explore regional variations of patient populations and reasons for accessing primary medical care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a cross-sectional observational study based on standardised interviews with 240 GPs and ∼1200 patients. Data collection started on 10 June 2015 and will probably be completed by 31 October 2016. We will include all districts and cities within 100 km from Hamburg and assign them according to the type of regions: rural, urban and environs. All eligible GPs will be invited to participate. Each practice will recruit up to 15 patients, aged 18 years or older. Questionnaires are based on a preliminary qualitative study and were pretested. Data will be analysed with descriptive statistics and regression modelling strategies adjusted for confounders and the GP-induced cluster structure. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association of Hamburg and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Study participants give written informed consent before data collection and data is pseudonymised. Survey data and person identifiers are stored separately in locked cabinets and have restricted availability. The results of our study will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02558322; Pre-results.

Indexed as

General PracticeRural HealthUrban HealthAnalysis of VarianceCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleGeneral PractitionersGermanyHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Qualitative Researchpatient typesPRIMARY CAREreasons for consultationregional variationrural areaurban area

Identifiers

PMID27357194
PMCPMC4932249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.