Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27357120›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2016

Anchored enrichment dataset for true flies (order Diptera) reveals insights into the phylogeny of flower flies (family Syrphidae).

Andrew Donovan Young, Alan R Lemmon, Jeffrey H Skevington, Ximo Mengual, Gunilla Ståhls, Menno Reemer, Kurt Jordaens, Scott Kelso, Emily Moriarty Lemmon, Martin Hauser and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
40.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Andrew Donovan YoungCanadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada. adyoung@gmail.com.
Alan R LemmonDepartment of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4102, USA.
Jeffrey H SkevingtonCanadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada.
Ximo MengualZoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, Bonn, D-53113, Germany.
Gunilla StåhlsFinnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Zoology unit, P.O.Box 17, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Menno ReemerNaturalis Biodiversity Center, EIS, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kurt JordaensInvertebrates Section, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, 3080, Tervuren, Belgium.
Scott KelsoCanadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada.
Emily Moriarty LemmonDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, 319 Stadium Dr., P.O. Box 3064295, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4295, USA.
Martin HauserPlant Pest Diagnostics Branch, California Department of Food & Agriculture, 3294 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, CA, 95832-1448, USA.
Marc De MeyerInvertebrates Section, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, 3080, Tervuren, Belgium.
Bernhard MisofZoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Zentrum für molekulare Biodiversitätsforschung, Adenauerallee 160, Bonn, D-53113, Germany.
Brian M WiegmannDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAFlorida State University · USRoyal Museum for Central Africa · BEZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig · DECalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture · USNaturalis Biodiversity Center · NLNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnchored hybrid enrichment is a form of next-generation sequencing that uses oligonucleotide probes to target conserved regions of the genome flanked by less conserved regions in order to acquire data useful for phylogenetic inference from a broad range of taxa. Once a probe kit is developed, anchored hybrid enrichment is superior to traditional PCR-based Sanger sequencing in terms of both the amount of genomic data that can be recovered and effective cost. Due to their incredibly diverse nature, importance as pollinators, and historical instability with regard to subfamilial and tribal classification, Syrphidae (flower flies or hoverflies) are an ideal candidate for anchored hybrid enrichment-based phylogenetics, especially since recent molecular phylogenies of the syrphids using only a few markers have resulted in highly unresolved topologies. Over 6200 syrphids are currently known and uncovering their phylogeny will help us to understand how these species have diversified, providing insight into an array of ecological processes, from the development of adult mimicry, the origin of adult migration, to pollination patterns and the evolution of larval resource utilization.

resultsWe present the first use of anchored hybrid enrichment in insect phylogenetics on a dataset containing 30 flower fly species from across all four subfamilies and 11 tribes out of 15. To produce a phylogenetic hypothesis, 559 loci were sampled to produce a final dataset containing 217,702 sites. We recovered a well resolved topology with bootstrap support values that were almost universally >95 %. The subfamily Eristalinae is recovered as paraphyletic, with the strongest support for this hypothesis to date. The ant predators in the Microdontinae are sister to all other syrphids. Syrphinae and Pipizinae are monophyletic and sister to each other. Larval predation on soft-bodied hemipterans evolved only once in this family.

conclusionsAnchored hybrid enrichment was successful in producing a robustly supported phylogenetic hypothesis for the syrphids. Subfamilial reconstruction is concordant with recent phylogenetic hypotheses, but with much higher support values. With the newly designed probe kit this analysis could be rapidly expanded with further sampling, opening the door to more comprehensive analyses targeting problem areas in syrphid phylogenetics and ecology.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsDipteraFlowersGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenyPollinationSequence Analysis, DNAAnchored phylogeneticsEristalinaeFlower fliesHoverfliesHybrid enrichmentMicrodontinaePipizinaeSyrphinae

Identifiers

PMID27357120
PMCPMC4928351
OpenAlexW2464624394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.