ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2016
[Update on the cutaneous neurobiology of pruritus].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trackins (Trk-Targeting Drugs): A Novel Therapy for Different Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Elevated Level of Serum Neurotrophin-4, but Not of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The Neuromodulatory Effect of Antipruritic Treatment of Chronic Prurigo.Dermatology and therapy · 2019Review
- Evaluation of serum levels of neurotrophin 4 and brain-derived nerve growth factor in uremic pruritus patients.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2019Article
- [Neurophysiology of atopic pruritus].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pathogenesis of chronic and acute pruritus is not yet completely understood. Interactions of neurons with resident and nonresident skin cells seem to play an important role in the regulation of pruritus. Neuronal cells which express specific receptors and are capable of releasing neuromediators play an active role in this interaction. Furthermore, released neuromediators can activate immune cells including mast cells and eosinophils, which are increased in the inflammatory infiltrate of many pruritic skin diseases. Mast cells and eosinophils express receptors for neuromediators themselves. In addition, they can release neurotrophins including nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and cytokines including interleukin (IL)-31 which correlate with disease activity in patients with inflammatory skin diseases including atopic dermatitis and induce neuronal outgrowth. In part, a correlation of these mediators has also been described with pruritus. Although the interplay between transient and resident cells in the skin with peripheral nerves, mast cells, and eosinophils plays an important role in the mutual activation, the neurobiological mechanisms that lead to pruritus are not completely clear yet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.