Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27356864›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Negative selection maintains transcription factor binding motifs in human cancer.

Ilya E Vorontsov, Grigory Khimulya, Elena N Lukianova, Daria D Nikolaeva, Irina A Eliseeva, Ivan V Kulakovskiy, Vsevolod J Makeev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ilya E VorontsovVavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, GSP-1, Gubkina 3, Moscow, Russia.
Grigory KhimulyaVavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, GSP-1, Gubkina 3, Moscow, Russia.
Elena N LukianovaVavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, GSP-1, Gubkina 3, Moscow, Russia.
Daria D NikolaevaFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, GSP-1, Vorobyevy Gory 1-73, Moscow, Russia.
Irina A EliseevaGroup of Protein Biosynthesis Regulation, Institute of Protein Research, 142290, Institutskaya 4, Pushchino, Russia.
Ivan V KulakovskiyVavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, GSP-1, Gubkina 3, Moscow, Russia. ivan.kulakovskiy@gmail.com.
Vsevolod J MakeevVavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, GSP-1, Gubkina 3, Moscow, Russia. vsevolod.makeev@gmail.com.
Vavilov Institute of General Genetics · RUInstitute of Protein Research · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSomatic mutations in cancer cells affect various genomic elements disrupting important cell functions. In particular, mutations in DNA binding sites recognized by transcription factors can alter regulator binding affinities and, consequently, expression of target genes. A number of promoter mutations have been linked with an increased risk of cancer. Cancer somatic mutations in binding sites of selected transcription factors have been found under positive selection. However, action and significance of negative selection in non-coding regions remain controversial.

resultsHere we present analysis of transcription factor binding motifs co-localized with non-coding variants. To avoid statistical bias we account for mutation signatures of different cancer types. For many transcription factors, including multiple members of FOX, HOX, and NR families, we show that human cancers accumulate fewer mutations than expected by chance that increase or decrease affinity of predicted binding sites. Such stability of binding motifs is even more exhibited in DNase accessible regions.

conclusionsOur data demonstrate negative selection against binding sites alterations and suggest that such selection pressure protects cancer cells from rewiring of regulatory circuits. Further analysis of transcription factors with conserved binding motifs can reveal cell regulatory pathways crucial for the survivability of various human cancers.

Indexed as

MutationBinding SitesDNAHumansNeoplasmsPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingSelection, GeneticTranscription FactorsDNATranscription FactorsCancer somatic mutationsDNA motifsNegative selectionTranscription factor binding sites

Identifiers

PMID27356864
PMCPMC4928157
OpenAlexW2964312557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.