Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27356650›Full record

ReviewNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2016

New advances in prevention of migraine. Review of current practice and recent advances.

Khalid W Al-Quliti, Ekhlas S Assaedi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Role of Genetic Polymorphisms in Chronic Pain Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khalid W Al-QulitiSection of Neurology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail: kh_alquliti@yahoo.com.
Ekhlas S Assaedi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being one of the most common disabling primary headaches, migraine continues to be underdiagnosed and under-treated. A migraine challenges not only the patient suffering from the migraine, but also physicians; especially in recognizing candidates for prophylaxis and selecting the appropriate preventive medication. Recently, there have been major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of migraine, with different guidelines of migraine management across the world. Here, we review migraines abortive and prophylactic medications, based on their pharmacologic category, citing their recommended doses, efficacy, and side effects. Additionally, we highlight the prophylactic treatment of specific patient populations and present suggested treatment approaches in view of recent international treatment guidelines that consider factors other than drug efficacy when choosing the optimal preventive therapy. Finally, we introduce drugs in different stages of development, which have novel mechanisms of action or have new therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCalcium Channel BlockersHumansMigraine DisordersTryptaminesAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCalcium Channel BlockersTryptamines

Identifiers

PMID27356650
PMCPMC5107285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.