Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27356102›Full record

Trial reportObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2016

No evidence for metabolic adaptation in thermic effect of food by dietary protein.

Elizabeth F Sutton, George A Bray, Jeffrey H Burton, Steven R Smith, Leanne M Redman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Day-to-day variability in resting metabolic rate in strength athletes.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dietary protein intake and obesity-associated cardiometabolic function.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. A word of caution against excessive protein intake.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth F SuttonLouisiana State University-Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
George A BrayLouisiana State University-Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Jeffrey H BurtonLouisiana State University-Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Steven R SmithTranslational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes, Florida Hospital and Sanford Burnham Medical Research Institute, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Leanne M RedmanLouisiana State University-Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine whether prolonged consumption of high- or low-protein diets modifies the thermogenic response to a standard meal.

methodsTwenty-four healthy individuals were randomized to overfeeding diets containing low (5%, n = 8), normal (15%, n = 9), or high (25%, n = 7) protein for 56 days while inpatients. The thermic effect of food (TEF) was measured over 4 h by indirect calorimetry following a standard meal (20% of energy, 20% protein) or a meal that matched the study diet ("study meal").

resultsAs expected, the TEF following the study meal (i.e., either low, normal, or high protein content) was significantly associated with dietary protein (P = 0.007), and the TEF was significantly increased in the high-protein diet (15.4%) versus the normal-protein (5.6%) and low-protein diets (6.4%) (P = 0.05 and P = 0.03, respectively). However, returning to a standard meal (20% protein) after 42 days of overfeeding the study diets, the TEF response did not differ from baseline between groups or within subjects regardless of the prolonged intake of the habitual study diet (high protein: P = 0.32, low protein: P = 0.11, normal protein: P = 0.79).

conclusionsTEF is related to acute dietary protein intake but not altered by prolonged intake of high-energy diets with high or low protein content.

Indexed as

AdultCalorimetry, IndirectDietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsDiet, Protein-RestrictedEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleDietary CarbohydratesDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27356102
PMCPMC4963285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.