Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27355949›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Verification of Geometric Model-Based Plant Phenotyping Methods for Studies of Xerophytic Plants.

Paweł Drapikowski, Ewa Kazimierczak-Grygiel, Dominik Korecki, Justyna Wiland-Szymańska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paweł DrapikowskiInstitute of Control and Information Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3a, 60-965 Poznan, Poland. pawel.drapikowski@put.poznan.pl.
Ewa Kazimierczak-GrygielBotanical Garden, Adam Mickiewicz University, Dąbrowskiego 165, 60-594 Poznan, Poland. ewakg@amu.edu.pl.
Dominik KoreckiInstitute of Control and Information Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3a, 60-965 Poznan, Poland. korecki.dominik@gmail.com.
Justyna Wiland-SzymańskaBotanical Garden, Adam Mickiewicz University, Dąbrowskiego 165, 60-594 Poznan, Poland. wiland@amu.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the results of verification of certain non-contact measurement methods of plant scanning to estimate morphological parameters such as length, width, area, volume of leaves and/or stems on the basis of computer models. The best results in reproducing the shape of scanned objects up to 50 cm in height were obtained with the structured-light DAVID Laserscanner. The optimal triangle mesh resolution for scanned surfaces was determined with the measurement error taken into account. The research suggests that measuring morphological parameters from computer models can supplement or even replace phenotyping with classic methods. Calculating precise values of area and volume makes determination of the S/V (surface/volume) ratio for cacti and other succulents possible, whereas for classic methods the result is an approximation only. In addition, the possibility of scanning and measuring plant species which differ in morphology was investigated.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDesiccationAloeImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLasersPhenotypePlant LeavesPlantsReproducibility of ResultsDAVID laser scanning systemmorphological parametersplant digitalization

Identifiers

PMID27355949
PMCPMC4969998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.