Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27355821›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Characterizing Blood Metabolomics Profiles Associated with Self-Reported Food Intakes in Female Twins.

Tess Pallister, Amy Jennings, Robert P Mohney, Darioush Yarand, Massimo Mangino, Aedin Cassidy, Alexander MacGregor, Tim D Spector, Cristina Menni

Open access · goldAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Uncovering the sex steroid hormone secrets in alcohol.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tess PallisterDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amy JenningsDepartment of Nutrition, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Robert P MohneyMetabolon, Inc., Durham, United States of America.
Darioush YarandDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Massimo ManginoDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aedin CassidyDepartment of Nutrition, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Alexander MacGregorDepartment of Nutrition, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Tim D SpectorDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Cristina MenniDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBMetabolon (United States) · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M004422/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using dietary biomarkers in nutritional epidemiological studies may better capture exposure and improve the level at which diet-disease associations can be established and explored. Here, we aimed to identify and evaluate reproducibility of novel biomarkers of reported habitual food intake using targeted and non-targeted metabolomic blood profiling in a large twin cohort. Reported intakes of 71 food groups, determined by FFQ, were assessed against 601 fasting blood metabolites in over 3500 adult female twins from the TwinsUK cohort. For each metabolite, linear regression analysis was undertaken in the discovery group (excluding MZ twin pairs discordant [≥1 SD apart] for food group intake) with each food group as a predictor adjusting for age, batch effects, BMI, family relatedness and multiple testing (1.17x10-6 = 0.05/[71 food groups x 601 detected metabolites]). Significant results were then replicated (non-targeted: P<0.05; targeted: same direction) in the MZ discordant twin group and results from both analyses meta-analyzed. We identified and replicated 180 significant associations with 39 food groups (P<1.17x10-6), overall consisting of 106 different metabolites (74 known and 32 unknown), including 73 novel associations. In particular we identified trans-4-hydroxyproline as a potential marker of red meat intake (0.075[0.009]; P = 1.08x10-17), ergothioneine as a marker of mushroom consumption (0.181[0.019]; P = 5.93x10-22), and three potential markers of fruit consumption (top association: apple and pears): including metabolites derived from gut bacterial transformation of phenolic compounds, 3-phenylpropionate (0.024[0.004]; P = 1.24x10-8) and indolepropionate (0.026[0.004]; P = 2.39x10-9), and threitol (0.033[0.003]; P = 1.69x10-21). With the largest nutritional metabolomics dataset to date, we have identified 73 novel candidate biomarkers of food intake for potential use in nutritional epidemiological studies. We compiled our findings into the DietMetab database (http://www.twinsuk.ac.uk/dietmetab-data/), an online tool to investigate our top associations.

Indexed as

DietEatingMetabolomeAdultBiomarkersBlood Chemical AnalysisBody Mass IndexCoffeeCohort StudiesFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansLinear ModelsPhenolQuality ControlRed MeatBiomarkersCoffeePhenolTea

Identifiers

PMID27355821
PMCPMC4927065
OpenAlexW2469941922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.