Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27355261›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2016

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Liberal Vs Restricted Perioperative Fluid Management in Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy.

Florence Grant, Murray F Brennan, Peter J Allen, Ronald P DeMatteo, T Peter Kingham, Michael D'Angelica, Mary E Fischer, Mithat Gonen, Hao Zhang, William R Jarnagin

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimens in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  10. Fifty years of pancreas cancer care.Journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Article
  11. A Single-Center Retrospective Study of Selected Clinical Parameters and Intraoperative Fluid Management of Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical Implications of Intraoperative Fluid Therapy in Pancreatic Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florence Grant*Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Memorial Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY †Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ‡Department of Surgery, Memorial Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY §Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Murray F Brennan
Peter J Allen
Ronald P DeMatteo
T Peter Kingham
Michael D'Angelica
Mary E Fischer
Mithat Gonen
Hao Zhang
William R Jarnagin
Memorial Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to examine, by a prospective randomized controlled trial, the influence of liberal (LIB) vs restricted (RES) perioperative fluid administration on morbidity following pancreatectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Randomized controlled trials in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery have challenged the historical use of LIB fluid administration, suggesting that a more restricted regimen may be associated with fewer postoperative complications.

methodsPatients scheduled to undergo pancreatic resection were consented for randomization to a LIB (n = 164) or RES (n = 166) perioperative fluid regimen. Sample size was designed with 80% power to decrease Grade 3 complications from 35% to 21%.

resultsBetween July 2009 and July 2015, we randomized 330 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD, n = 218), central (n = 16), or distal pancreatectomy (DP, n = 96). Patients were equally distributed for all demographic and intraoperative characteristics. Intraoperatively, LIB patients received crystalloid 12 mL/kg/h and RES patients 6 mL/kg/h. Cumulative crystalloid given (median, range, mL) days 0 to 3 was LIB: 12,252 (6600 to 21,365), RES 7808 (2700 to 16,274) P < 0.0001. Sixty-day mortality was 2 of 330 (0.6%). Median operative time for PD was 227 minutes (105 to 462) and DP 150 (44 to 323). Grade 3 complications occurred in 20% of LIB and 27% of RES patients (P = 0.6). Median length of stay was 7 and 5 days for PD and DP, respectively, in both arms.

conclusionsIn a high volume institution, major perioperative complications from pancreatic resection were not significantly influenced by fluid regimens that differed approximately 1.6-fold.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyPancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyPerioperative CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCrystalloid SolutionsFemaleHumansIsotonic SolutionsMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic DiseasesProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID27355261
PMCPMC5017901
OpenAlexW2475334357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.