ArticleInnovations in clinical neuroscience
Diagnosing Disorder of Consciousness: The Opening of Pandora's Box!
Article in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05819177 (An Analysis of the Information of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Providing the Most Reliable Prediction of the Neurobehavioral State and Recovery of Consciousness), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Analysis of the Information of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Providing the Most Reliable Prediction of the Neurobehavioral State and Recovery of Consciousness
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which information derived from the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised provides the most reliable prediction of clinical diagnosis and recovery of consciousness? A comparative study using machine learning techniques.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- Unlocking Hidden Awareness: Repurposing fMRI to Detect Levels of Consciousness.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Disorders of Consciousness: Painless or Painful Conditions?-Evidence from Neuroimaging Studies.Brain sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
27354922PMC4911934What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.