Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27354749›Full record

ArticleHospital pharmacy2016

Effect of the Implementation of Barcode Technology and an Electronic Medication Administration Record on Adverse Drug Events.

Erin Truitt, Ross Thompson, Deborah Blazey-Martin, Danna NiSai, Deeb Salem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hospital pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to reduce medication errors in anesthesia: a systematic review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Modeling anesthetic-drug label detection for low-resource operating rooms.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Raman Molecular Fingerprints of SARS-CoV-2 British Variant and the Concept of Raman Barcode.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  9. Propofol 2%: understanding a new concentration of a well-known medication.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Position paper on patient safety.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Medical Errors Cause Harm in Veterinary Hospitals.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  15. Implementation of Bar-Code Medication Administration to Reduce Patient Harm.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erin Truitt
Ross Thompson
Deborah Blazey-Martin
Danna NiSai
Deeb Salem

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitals have attempted to reduce adverse drug events (ADEs) by investing in new technologies, but data regarding their efficacy are lacking.

objectivesThis study evaluates the effects of the implementation of barcode medication administration (BCMA) and electronic medication administration record (eMAR) technology on the profile of ADEs in a hospital setting.

methodsWe conducted a before-and-after study examining the effects of the implementation of BCMA and eMAR technology on the profile of ADEs at a 400-bed academic medical center by using incident reports. We compared reported ADEs in pre- and post-implementation periods of 5 months to determine whether there was a reduction in the rate of ADEs within medication use phases. We further examined the severity of errors and described changes in the distribution of types of errors.

resultsA total of 775 electronic error-reporting system reports were included in this study: 397 (51%) in the pre-implementation period and 378 (49%) in the post-implementation period. The rate of ADEs significantly decreased from 0.26% to 0.20% after implementation of the technology (relative risk [RR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.89). The rate of transcription errors decreased from 0.089% to 0.036% (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.30-0.54), which was largely attributed to reduction of "wrong time" errors. The rate of administration errors was identical in both groups at 0.017% (RR, 0.98; 95% CI 0.58-1.66). The mean severity level of administration errors significantly decreased from 4.44 to 3.23 (p = .005).

conclusionThe implementation of eMAR and BCMA technology improved patient safety by decreasing the overall rate of ADEs and the rate of transcription errors. These technologies also reduced the harmful impact to patients caused by administration errors.

Indexed as

adverse drug eventsbarcode medication administration technologyelectronic medication administration record

Identifiers

PMID27354749
PMCPMC4911988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.