Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2735472›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health1989

The power of policy: the relationship of smoking policy to adolescent smoking.

M A Pentz, B R Brannon, V L Charlin, E J Barrett, D P MacKinnon, B R Flay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. School policies for preventing smoking among young people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Attribute-centred theorizing to address behavioural changes.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Article
  6. Economic Evaluation of Five Tobacco Control Policies Across Seven European Countries.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of a smoking ban and school-based prevention and control policies on adolescent smoking in Spain: a multilevel analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Smoking patterns in Oregon youth: effects of funding and defunding of a comprehensive state tobacco control program.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2009
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M A PentzInstitute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Pasadena 91101.
B R Brannon
V L Charlin
E J Barrett
D P MacKinnon
B R Flay

Funding

DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION--ADOLESCENCE AND EARLY ADULTHOODR01DA003976 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PENTZ, MARY ANN · 1986 to 2000
$748k
COMPREHENSIVE SMOKING PREVENTIONR01DA003468 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J · 1985 to 1989
–
NIDA NIH HHS DA03468NIDA NIH HHS DA03976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the effects of smoking policy on 4,807 adolescents in 23 schools over a two-county area in California. Amounts and prevalence rates of adolescent smoking were measured with a self-report survey and a biochemical measure; school smoking policy was measured with two independent surveys of school staff. Policy effects were evaluated with multiple and logistic regression analyses controlling for school-level socioeconomic status and environmental support for teaching and administration. Of the 23 schools, 100 percent had a formal written and regularly enforced policy component restricting student smoking on school grounds, 94 percent restricted students leaving school grounds, 65 percent restricted smoking near school grounds, and 57 percent had a smoking prevention education plan. Schools with policies having all four versus less than four components, high versus low emphasis on prevention, and a low versus high emphasis on cessation reported lower amounts of smoking in the last week and in the last 24 hours. Punitive consequences of policy violation had no effect. Results were compared to school staff observations of adolescent smoking, and school archival records of student smoking violations in the last year. Results suggest that school smoking policy is associated with decreased amounts of smoking in adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorHealth PolicySmoking PreventionAdolescentCaliforniaFemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleSchoolsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID2735472
PMCPMC1349666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.