Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27354505›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in public health2016

Time to abandon the hygiene hypothesis: new perspectives on allergic disease, the human microbiome, infectious disease prevention and the role of targeted hygiene.

Sally F Bloomfield, Graham Aw Rook, Elizabeth A Scott, Fergus Shanahan, Rosalind Stanwell-Smith, Paul Turner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
32.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 270 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Asia Pacific allergy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sally F BloomfieldLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene, The Old Dairy Cottage, Montacute, Somerset TA15 6XL, UK sallyfbloomfield@aol.com.
Graham Aw RookCentre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Elizabeth A ScottCenter for Hygiene and Health, Department of Biology, Simmons College, Boston, MA, USA.
Fergus ShanahanAPC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork - National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Rosalind Stanwell-SmithLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Paul TurnerSection of Paediatrics (Allergy & Infectious Diseases) and MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK; Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBImperial College London · GBNational University of Ireland · IESimmons University · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K010468/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo review the burden of allergic and infectious diseases and the evidence for a link to microbial exposure, the human microbiome and immune system, and to assess whether we could develop lifestyles which reconnect us with exposures which could reduce the risk of allergic disease while also protecting against infectious disease.

methodsUsing methodology based on the Delphi technique, six experts in infectious and allergic disease were surveyed to allow for elicitation of group judgement and consensus view on issues pertinent to the aim.

resultsKey themes emerged where evidence shows that interaction with microbes that inhabit the natural environment and human microbiome plays an essential role in immune regulation. Changes in lifestyle and environmental exposure, rapid urbanisation, altered diet and antibiotic use have had profound effects on the human microbiome, leading to failure of immunotolerance and increased risk of allergic disease. Although evidence supports the concept of immune regulation driven by microbe-host interactions, the term 'hygiene hypothesis' is a misleading misnomer. There is no good evidence that hygiene, as the public understands, is responsible for the clinically relevant changes to microbial exposures.

conclusionEvidence suggests a combination of strategies, including natural childbirth, breast feeding, increased social exposure through sport, other outdoor activities, less time spent indoors, diet and appropriate antibiotic use, may help restore the microbiome and perhaps reduce risks of allergic disease. Preventive efforts must focus on early life. The term 'hygiene hypothesis' must be abandoned. Promotion of a risk assessment approach (targeted hygiene) provides a framework for maximising protection against pathogen exposure while allowing spread of essential microbes between family members. To build on these findings, we must change public, public health and professional perceptions about the microbiome and about hygiene. We need to restore public understanding of hygiene as a means to prevent infectious disease.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureHygiene HypothesisHypersensitivityMicrobiotaDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansHygieneMaleallergyantibioticscleaningdiethygieneinfectious disease

Identifiers

PMID27354505
PMCPMC4966430
OpenAlexW2469947652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.