Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27354176›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2017

Development and evaluation of an ultrasonic personal aerosol sampler.

J Volckens, C Quinn, D Leith, J Mehaffy, C S Henry, D Miller-Lionberg

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Impact of the Wood-BurningEnvironmental health perspectives · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Validation and Correction of PMACS environmental Au · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How Do Household Energy Transitions Work?Research report (Health Effects Institute) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Familial Differences in Personal PMEnvironmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J VolckensDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
C QuinnDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
D LeithDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
J MehaffyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
C S HenryDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
D Miller-LionbergDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Funding

Low-Cost Versatile Sampler for Personal PM Exposure by MicroenvironmentR33ES024719 · NIEHS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY, CHARLES S, VOLCKENS, JOHN · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
A New Paradigm for Workplace Air Sampling and Cost-Effective Exposure AssessmentR01OH010662 · OH · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY, CHARLES S, VOLCKENS, JOHN · 2015 to 2018
$2.0M
Low-Cost Versatile Sampler for Personal PM Exposure by MicroenvironmentR21ES024719 · NIEHS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY, CHARLES S, VOLCKENS, JOHN · 2015 to 2016
$442k
ACL HHS R01OH010662NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES024719NIEHS NIH HHS R33 ES024719NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH010662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing personal exposure to air pollution has long proven challenging due to technological limitations posed by the samplers themselves. Historically, wearable aerosol monitors have proven to be expensive, noisy, and burdensome. The objective of this work was to develop a new type of wearable monitor, an ultrasonic personal aerosol sampler (UPAS), to overcome many of the technological limitations in personal exposure assessment. The UPAS is a time-integrated monitor that features a novel micropump that is virtually silent during operation. A suite of onboard environmental sensors integrated with this pump measure and record mass airflow (0.5-3.0 L/min, accurate within 5%), temperature, pressure, relative humidity, light intensity, and acceleration. Rapid development of the UPAS was made possible through recent advances in low-cost electronics, open-source programming platforms, and additive manufacturing for rapid prototyping. Interchangeable cyclone inlets provided a close match to the EPA PM

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAerosolsAir PollutantsEnvironmental MonitoringEquipment DesignHumansUltrasonicsAerosolsAir Pollutantsair pollutioncitizen scienceexposurelow costPM2.5sensorwearable

Identifiers

PMID27354176
PMCPMC5199626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.