Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27354091›Full record

ArticleJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2016

NOS knockout or inhibition but not disrupting PSD-95-NOS interaction protect against ischemic brain damage.

Christoph Kleinschnitz, Stine Mencl, Pamela W M Kleikers, Michael K Schuhmann, Manuela G López, Ana I Casas, Bilge Sürün, Andreas Reif, Harald H H W Schmidt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. From single drug targets to synergistic network pharmacology in ischemic stroke.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NOX4-dependent neuronal autotoxicity and BBB breakdown explain the superior sensitivity of the brain to ischemic damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Christoph KleinschnitzDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany christoph.kleinschnitz@uk-essen.de.
Stine MenclDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Pamela W M KleikersDepartment for Pharmacology and Personalised Medicine, CARIM, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Michael K SchuhmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Manuela G LópezDepartamento de Farmacologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ana I CasasDepartment for Pharmacology and Personalised Medicine, CARIM, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Departamento de Farmacologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Bilge SürünDepartment of Medical Informatics, Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Andreas ReifDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Harald H H W SchmidtDepartment for Pharmacology and Personalised Medicine, CARIM, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEMaastricht University · NLUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESMiddle East Technical University · TRUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

European Research Council 294682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promising results have been reported in preclinical stroke target validation for pharmacological principles that disrupt the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-post-synaptic density protein-95-neuronal nitric oxide synthase complex. However, post-synaptic density protein-95 is also coupled to potentially neuroprotective mechanisms. As post-synaptic density protein-95 inhibitors may interfere with potentially neuroprotective mechanisms and sufficient validation has often been an issue in translating basic stroke research, we wanted to close that gap by comparing post-synaptic density protein-95 inhibitors with NOS1(-/-) mice and a NOS inhibitor. We confirm the deleterious role of NOS1 in stroke both in vivo and in vitro, but find three pharmacological post-synaptic density protein-95 inhibitors to be therapeutically ineffective.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain InjuriesBrain IschemiaDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinEnzyme InhibitorsGuanylate KinasesMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, KnockoutNeuroprotective AgentsNitric Oxide Synthase Type IProtein BindingDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinDlg4 protein, mouseEnzyme InhibitorsGuanylate KinasesMembrane ProteinsNeuroprotective AgentsNitric Oxide Synthase Type INos1 protein, mouseexcitotoxicityexperimentalfree radicalsNitric oxidestroke

Identifiers

PMID27354091
PMCPMC5012526
OpenAlexW2465535542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.