Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27354077›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Sources of social support associated with health and quality of life: a cross-sectional study among Canadian and Latin American older adults.

Emmanuelle Bélanger, Tamer Ahmed, Afshin Vafaei, Carmen Lucia Curcio, Susan P Phillips, Maria Victoria Zunzunegui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Quality of life in the elderly: A community study.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emmanuelle BélangerDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Public Health Research Institute (IRSPUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Tamer AhmedDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Afshin VafaeiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Carmen Lucia CurcioFaculty of Health Sciences, Research Group on Geriatrics and Gerontology, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics Collaborative Centre, University of Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.
Susan P PhillipsDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Maria Victoria ZunzuneguiDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Public Health Research Institute (IRSPUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine whether the association between emotional support and indicators of health and quality of life differs between Canadian and Latin American older adults.

designCross-sectional analysis of the International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS). Social support from friends, family members, children and partner was measured with a previously validated social network and support scale (IMIAS-SNSS). Low social support was defined as ranking in the lowest site-specific quartile. Prevalence ratios (PR) of good health, depression and good quality of life were estimated with Poisson regression models, adjusting for age, gender, education, income and disability in activities of daily living.

settingKingston and Saint-Hyacinthe in Canada, Manizales in Colombia and Natal in Brazil.

participants1600 community-dwelling adults aged 65-74 years, n=400 at each site. OUTCOME MEASURES: Likert scale question on self-rated health, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale and 10-point analogical quality-of-life (QoL) scale.

resultsRelationships between social support and study outcomes differed between Canadian and Latin American older adults. Among Canadians, those without a partner had a lower prevalence of good health (PR=0.90; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.98), and those with high support from friends had a higher prevalence of good health (PR=1.09; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18). Among Latin Americans, depression was lower among those with high levels of support from family (PR=0.63; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.83), children (PR=0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.80) and partner (PR=0.57; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.77); good QoL was associated with high levels of support from children (PR=1.54; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.99) and partner (PR=1.31; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.67).

conclusionsAmong older adults, different sources of support were relevant to health across societies. Support from friends and having a partner were related to good health in Canada, whereas in Latin America, support from family, children and partner were associated with less depression and better QoL.

Indexed as

AgingSocial SupportActivities of Daily LivingAgedBrazilCanadaColombiaCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLogistic ModelsMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeAgingCross-cultural gerontologySocial determinants of healthSocial support

Identifiers

PMID27354077
PMCPMC4932270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.