Observational studyBMJ open2016
What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Natural language processing with machine learning methods to analyze unstructured patient-reported outcomes derived from electronic health records: A systematic review.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Pooled it
- TimeX: Phenotype Onset Extraction from Clinical Narratives.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Dog Bite Injuries in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Observational
- Retrospective Analysis of Burn Injuries in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Observational
- Applications of Machine Learning on Electronic Health Record Data to Combat Antibiotic Resistance.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2024Review
- Comparing natural language processing representations of coded disease sequences for prediction in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Electronic Medical Record-Based Case Phenotyping for the Charlson Conditions: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Toward the Development of Data Governance Standards for Using Clinical Free-Text Data in Health Research: Position Paper.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens' jury study in the UK.Journal of medical ethics · 2020Article
- Can the Use of Bayesian Analysis Methods Correct for Incompleteness in Electronic Health Records Diagnosis Data? Development of a Novel Method Using Simulated and Real-Life Clinical Data.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Route to heart failure diagnosis in English primary care: a retrospective cohort study of variation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- The incidence, prevalence, and survival of systemic sclerosis in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.Clinical rheumatology · 2018Article
- Natural language processing of clinical notes for identification of critical limb ischemia.International journal of medical informatics · 2018Article
- Application of a Natural Language Processing Algorithm to Asthma Ascertainment. An Automated Chart Review.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017Article
- Making Sense of Big Textual Data for Health Care: Findings from the Section on Clinical Natural Language Processing.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMuch research with electronic health records (EHRs) uses coded or structured data only; important information captured in the free text remains unused. One dimension of EHR data quality assessment is 'currency' or timeliness, that is, data are representative of the patient state at the time of measurement. We explored the use of free text in UK general practice patient records to evaluate delays in recording of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis. We also aimed to locate and quantify disease and diagnostic information recorded only in text.
settingUK general practice patient records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
participants294 individuals with incident diagnosis of RA between 2005 and 2008; 204 women and 85 men, median age 63 years. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of (1) quantity and timing of text entries for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as a proxy for the RA disease code, and (2) quantity, location and timing of free text information relating to RA onset and diagnosis.
resultsInflammatory markers, pain and DMARDs were the most common categories of disease information in text prior to RA diagnostic code; 10-37% of patients had such information only in text. Read codes associated with RA-related text included correspondence, general consultation and arthritis codes. 64 patients (22%) had DMARD text entries >14 days prior to RA code; these patients had more and earlier referrals to rheumatology, tests, swelling, pain and DMARD prescriptions, suggestive of an earlier implicit diagnosis than was recorded by the diagnostic code.
conclusionsRA-related symptoms, tests, referrals and prescriptions were recorded in free text with 22% of patients showing strong evidence of delay in coding of diagnosis. Researchers using EHRs may need to mitigate for delayed codes by incorporating text into their case-ascertainment strategies. Natural language processing techniques have the capability to do this at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.