Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27354069›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2016

What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text.

Elizabeth Ford, John Carroll, Helen Smith, Kevin Davies, Rob Koeling, Irene Petersen, Greta Rait, Jackie Cassell

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Route to heart failure diagnosis in English primary care: a retrospective cohort study of variation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth FordDivision of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
John CarrollDepartment of Informatics, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Helen SmithDivision of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Kevin DaviesDivision of Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Rob KoelingDepartment of Informatics, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Irene PetersenResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Greta RaitResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Jackie CassellDivision of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 086105/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMuch research with electronic health records (EHRs) uses coded or structured data only; important information captured in the free text remains unused. One dimension of EHR data quality assessment is 'currency' or timeliness, that is, data are representative of the patient state at the time of measurement. We explored the use of free text in UK general practice patient records to evaluate delays in recording of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis. We also aimed to locate and quantify disease and diagnostic information recorded only in text.

settingUK general practice patient records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

participants294 individuals with incident diagnosis of RA between 2005 and 2008; 204 women and 85 men, median age 63 years. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of (1) quantity and timing of text entries for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as a proxy for the RA disease code, and (2) quantity, location and timing of free text information relating to RA onset and diagnosis.

resultsInflammatory markers, pain and DMARDs were the most common categories of disease information in text prior to RA diagnostic code; 10-37% of patients had such information only in text. Read codes associated with RA-related text included correspondence, general consultation and arthritis codes. 64 patients (22%) had DMARD text entries >14 days prior to RA code; these patients had more and earlier referrals to rheumatology, tests, swelling, pain and DMARD prescriptions, suggestive of an earlier implicit diagnosis than was recorded by the diagnostic code.

conclusionsRA-related symptoms, tests, referrals and prescriptions were recorded in free text with 22% of patients showing strong evidence of delay in coding of diagnosis. Researchers using EHRs may need to mitigate for delayed codes by incorporating text into their case-ascertainment strategies. Natural language processing techniques have the capability to do this at scale.

Indexed as

Clinical CodingDelayed DiagnosisAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime-to-TreatmentUnited KingdomAntirheumatic Agentsdata qualityelectronic health recordsfree textgeneral practiceRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID27354069
PMCPMC4932264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.