ArticleHuman brain mapping2016
Dynamic functional connectivity shapes individual differences in associative learning.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenging Cognitive Load Theory: The Role of Educational Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Learning Efficacy.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Monotonicity in graph theoretic summaries of fMRI data acquired during human learning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Individual cognitive traits can be predicted from task-based dynamic functional connectivity with a deep convolutional-recurrent model.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Electrocortical correlates of attention differentiate individual capacity in associative learning.NPJ science of learning · 2024Article
- Time-specific convergence and divergence in individual differences in behavior: Theory, protocols and analyzes.Ecology and evolution · 2023Review
- Brain parcellation driven by dynamic functional connectivity better capture intrinsic network dynamics.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Cortical electrophysiological evidence for individual-specific temporal organization of brain functional networks.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Functional brain network reconfiguration during learning in a dynamic environment.Nature communications · 2020Article
- A Deep Network Model on Dynamic Functional Connectivity With Applications to Gender Classification and Intelligence Prediction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Manifold Learning of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Reliably Identifies Functionally Consistent Coupling Patterns in Human Brains.Brain sciences · 2019Article
- Educational fMRI: From the Lab to the Classroom.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- The behavioral and cognitive relevance of time-varying, dynamic changes in functional connectivity.NeuroImage · 2018Review
- Dynamic graph metrics: Tutorial, toolbox, and tale.NeuroImage · 2018Article
- Cohesive network reconfiguration accompanies extended training.Human brain mapping · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current neuroscientific research has shown that the brain reconfigures its functional interactions at multiple timescales. Here, we sought to link transient changes in functional brain networks to individual differences in behavioral and cognitive performance by using an active learning paradigm. Participants learned associations between pairs of unrelated visual stimuli by using feedback. Interindividual behavioral variability was quantified with a learning rate measure. By using a multivariate statistical framework (partial least squares), we identified patterns of network organization across multiple temporal scales (within a trial, millisecond; across a learning session, minute) and linked these to the rate of change in behavioral performance (fast and slow). Results indicated that posterior network connectivity was present early in the trial for fast, and later in the trial for slow performers. In contrast, connectivity in an associative memory network (frontal, striatal, and medial temporal regions) occurred later in the trial for fast, and earlier for slow performers. Time-dependent changes in the posterior network were correlated with visual/spatial scores obtained from independent neuropsychological assessments, with fast learners performing better on visual/spatial subtests. No relationship was found between functional connectivity dynamics in the memory network and visual/spatial test scores indicative of cognitive skill. By using a comprehensive set of measures (behavioral, cognitive, and neurophysiological), we report that individual variations in learning-related performance change are supported by differences in cognitive ability and time-sensitive connectivity in functional neural networks. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3911-3928, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.