Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27353596›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016

Risk of hip, subtrochanteric, and femoral shaft fractures among mid and long term users of alendronate: nationwide cohort and nested case-control study.

Bo Abrahamsen, Pia Eiken, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra, Richard Eastell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Long-term cost-effectiveness of screening for fracture risk in a UK primary care setting: the SCOOP study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Manual chart review reveals bisphosphonate exposure misclassification in atypical femur fracture patients: auditing medical records in two international cohorts.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Osteoporosis in 2022: Care gaps to screening and personalised medicine.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bo AbrahamsenOdense Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9 A, 3. Sal, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300 Holbæk, Denmark.
Pia EikenDepartment of Cardiology, Nephrology and Endocrinology, Hillerød Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark, Pia Eiken Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark, Pia Eiken.
Daniel Prieto-AlhambraOxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeltal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK Musculoskeletal Research Unit, IMIM-Parc de Salut Mar and RETICEF, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and Instituto Carlos III (FEDER Research Funds), Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Spain, Daniel.prietoalhambra@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Richard EastellAcademic Unit of Bone Metabolism (AUBM), Northern General Hospital and University of Sheffield, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006312/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the skeletal safety and efficacy of long term (≥10 years) alendronate use in patients with osteoporosis.

designOpen register based cohort study containing two nested case control studies.

settingNationwide study of population of Denmark.

participants61 990 men and women aged 50-94 at the start of treatment, who had not previously taken alendronate, 1996-2007.

interventionsTreatment with alendronate.

main outcome measuresIncident fracture of the subtrochanteric femur or femoral shaft (ST/FS) or the hip. Non-fracture controls from the cohort were matched to fracture cases by sex, year of birth, and year of initiation of alendronate treatment. Conditional logistic regression models were fitted to calculate odds ratios with and without adjustment for comorbidity and comedications. Sensitivity analyses investigated subsequent treatment with other drugs for osteoporosis.

results1428 participants sustained a ST/FS (incidence rate 3.4/1000 person years, 95% confidence interval 3.2 to 3.6), and 6784 sustained a hip fracture (16.2/1000 person years, 15.8 to 16.6). The risk of ST/FS was lower with high adherence to treatment with alendronate (medication possession ratio (MPR, a proxy for compliance) >80%) compared with poor adherence (MPR <50%; odds ratio 0.88, 0.77 to 0.99; P=0.05). Multivariable adjustment attenuated this association (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 0.77 to 1.01; P=0.08). The risk was no higher in long term users (≥10 dose years; 0.70, 0.44 to 1.11; P=0.13) or in current compared with past users (0.91, 0.79 to 1.06; P=0.22). Similarly, MPR >80% was associated with a decreased risk of hip fracture (0.73, 0.68 to 0.78; P<0.001) as was longer term cumulative use for 5-10 dose years (0.74, 0.67 to 0.83; P<0.001) or ≥10 dose years (0.74, 0.56 to 0.97; P=0.03).

conclusionsThese findings support an acceptable balance between benefit and risk with treatment with alendronate in terms of fracture outcomes, even for over 10 years of continuous use.

Indexed as

AlendronateFemoral FracturesOsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overBone Density Conservation AgentsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesComorbidityDenmarkFemaleHumansIncidenceLong Term Adverse EffectsMaleMiddle AgedAlendronateBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID27353596
PMCPMC4924596
OpenAlexW2469121272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.