Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27353265›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Antibacterial Efficacy of Eravacycline In Vivo against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Organisms.

Marguerite L Monogue, Abrar K Thabit, Yukihiro Hamada, David P Nicolau

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06440304 (Therapeutic Strategies for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06440304 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Strategies for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Infections: Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinical Hospital Centre ZagrebRan2025 to 2027Enrolled108ConditionsInfections, Bacterial, Sepsis BacterialArmsFosfomycin, Eravacycline, ampicillin/sulbactam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emergence of eravacycline heteroresistance in carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  17. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Mechanism of Eravacycline Resistance in ClinicalFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Eravacycline, a newly approved fluorocycline.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Marguerite L MonogueCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Abrar K ThabitCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-9094
Yukihiro HamadaCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA Aichi Medical University Hospital School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA david.nicolau@hhchealth.org.
Hartford Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the tetracycline class are frequently classified as bacteriostatic. However, recent findings have demonstrated an improved antibacterial killing profile, often achieving ≥3 log10 bacterial count reduction, when such antibiotics have been given for periods longer than 24 h. We aimed to study this effect with eravacycline, a novel fluorocycline, given in an immunocompetent murine thigh infection model over 72 h against two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates (eravacycline MICs = 0.03 and 0.25 μg/ml) and three Enterobacteriaceae isolates (eravacycline MICs = 0.125 to 0.25 μg/ml). A humanized eravacycline regimen, 2.5 mg/kg of body weight given intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h (q12h), demonstrated progressively enhanced activity over the 72-h study period. A cumulative dose response in which bacterial density was reduced by more than 3 log10 CFU at 72 h was noted over the study period in the two Gram-positive isolates, and eravacycline performed similarly to comparator antibiotics (tigecycline, linezolid, and vancomycin). A cumulative dose response with eravacycline and comparators (tigecycline and meropenem) over the study period was also observed in the Gram-negative isolates, although more variability in bacterial killing was observed for all antibacterial agents. Overall, a bacterial count reduction of ≥3 log was achieved in one of the three isolates with both eravacycline and tigecycline, while meropenem achieved a similar endpoint against two of the three isolates. Bactericidal activity is typically defined in vitro over 24 h; however, extended regimen studies in vivo may demonstrate an improved correlation with clinical outcomes by better identification of antimicrobial effects.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaLinezolidMeropenemMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMinocyclineStaphylococcus aureusTetracyclinesThienamycinsTigecyclineVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentseravacyclineLinezolidMeropenemMinocyclineTetracyclinesThienamycinsTigecyclineVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID27353265
PMCPMC4958151
OpenAlexW2461641769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.