Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27353250›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Intranasal Administration of Chitosan Against Influenza A (H7N9) Virus Infection in a Mouse Model.

Mei Zheng, Di Qu, Haiming Wang, Zhiping Sun, Xueying Liu, Jianjun Chen, Changgui Li, Xuguang Li, Ze Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. In Vitro Anti-HIV-1 Activity of Chitosan OligomersBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles Against Viral Infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mei ZhengShanghai Institute of Biological Products, Shanghai 200052, China.
Di QuBiosafety Level-3 Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology MOE &MOH, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Haiming WangShanghai Institute of Biological Products, Shanghai 200052, China.
Zhiping SunBiosafety Level-3 Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology MOE &MOH, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xueying LiuShanghai Institute of Biological Products, Shanghai 200052, China.
Jianjun ChenState Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, China.
Changgui LiNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Beijing, China.
Xuguang LiCentre for Vaccine Evaluation, Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ze ChenShanghai Institute of Biological Products, Shanghai 200052, China.
Fudan University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNHealth Canada · CAHunan Normal University · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza virus evolves constantly in an unpredictable fashion, making it necessary to vaccinate people annually for effective prevention and control of influenza. In general, however, during the first wave of an influenza outbreak caused by a newly emerging virus strain, influenza morbidity and mortality have been observed to rise sharply due to the lack of a matching vaccine. This necessitates the exploration of novel intervention approaches, particularly those prophylactic or therapeutic agents that have a broad range of antiviral activities and are also proven to be non-toxic. Here, we reported that stimulation of the innate immune system by intranasal administration of chitosan as a single agent was sufficient to completely protect BALB/c mice from lethal infection by H7N9 virus, a newly emerged viral strain that is highly pathogenic to humans. Remarkably, animals could still be protected against lethal challenge by H7N9 (10×LD50), even ten days after the intranasal chitosan administration. The significantly enhanced infiltration of leukocytes in the bronchoalveolar lavage and elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the bronchia/lung tissues revealed the potent activation of mucosal immune responses by intranasally delivered chitosan. We also observed that chitosan can protect mice from three other virus strains. The marked breadth and magnitude of protection against diverse viral strains makes chitosan an attractive candidate as a universal anti-influenza agent.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsChitosanImmunity, InnateInfluenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypeMiceMice, Inbred BALB COrthomyxoviridae InfectionsChitosan

Identifiers

PMID27353250
PMCPMC4926116
OpenAlexW2468035250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.