Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27353168›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antibiotics2017

Antibacterial fatty acids destabilize hydrophobic and multicellular aggregates of biofilm in S. aureus.

Zulfiqar Ali Mirani, Shagufta Naz, Fouzia Khan, Mubashir Aziz, Asadullah, Muhammad Naseem Khan, Seema Ismat Khan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antibiotics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biodegradable Films TargetingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Inhibitory Efficacy ofBiology · 2025
    Article
  5. A unique combination of natural fatty acids fromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Silicon nanoparticles: A promising approach for control ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zulfiqar Ali MiraniMicrobiological Analytical Centre, Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Laboratories Complex, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shagufta NazMicrobiological Analytical Centre, Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Laboratories Complex, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fouzia KhanDepartment of Pathology, Dow University Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mubashir AzizDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology Section, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
AsadullahMicrobiological Analytical Centre, Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Laboratories Complex, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Naseem KhanMicrobiological Analytical Centre, Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Laboratories Complex, Karachi, Pakistan.
Seema Ismat KhanMicrobiological Analytical Centre, Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Laboratories Complex, Karachi, Pakistan.
Pakistan Council of Scientific & Industrial Research · PKBahauddin Zakariya University · PKDow University of Health Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Present study is based on 20 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates recovered from different food items. These isolates were identified on the basis of colony morphology, Gram staining and growth on different selective and differential media. Studies on 16S RNA and positive reactions on DNase agar and Prolex Latex Agglutination system confirm it as Staphylococcus aureus. Oxacillin susceptibility testing and PCR with mecA gene-specific primer results showed that these isolates are MRSA-carrying mecA gene that belongs to SCCmecA type IV and also harbor agr type II. Phenotypic study revealed that these isolates adopt biofilm mode of growth after exposure to subinhibitory doses of oxacillin. The biofilm and cell surface hydrophobicity have a strong correlation. It was noticed that affinity to hexadecane (apolar-solvent) of planktonic cells was low, suggesting its hydrophilic character. However, as the cells are exposed to oxacillin, they adopt biofilm mode of life and the affinity to apolar solvent increases, indicating a hydrophobic character. In biofilm consortia, the cells with more hydrophobic surfaces show incomplete septation and produce multicellular aggregates. This is due to reduced expression of atl gene. This was confirmed by real-time PCR studies. Moreover, the planktonic or wild-type phenotypes of these isolates were more tolerant to antibacterial effect of the fatty acids used; that is, cis-2-decanoic acid and cis-9-octadectanoic acid. These fatty acids were more effective against biofilms. After exposure to these fatty acids, established biofilms were dispersed and surviving cells were unable to readopt biofilm mode of life. The planktonic or wild-type phenotypes produce fatty acid-modifying enzyme (FAME) to inactivate the bactericidal activity of fatty acids by esterification to cholesterol. The biofilm indwellers are metabolically inactive and unable to produce FAME; hence, they are vulnerable to antibiofilm effect of cis-2-decanoic acid and cis-9-octadectanoic acid.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsFatty AcidsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusOxacillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsFatty AcidsOxacillin

Identifiers

PMID27353168
OpenAlexW2475221759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.