ReviewDer Radiologe2016
[Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for spinal trauma].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of different bone cement distribution patterns on cement leakage in percutaneous curved vertebroplasty versus bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Upper thoracic T1 and T2 percutaneous vertebroplasty: a review of 10 years of experience.European radiology · 2026Article
- Safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty: report of a large cohort and systematic review.European radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical issueMinimally invasive treatment of spinal fractures. STANDARD TREATMENT PROCEDURES: Conservative treatment versus spinal surgery. TREATMENT INNOVATIONS: Minimally invasive stabilization techniques, such as percutaneous (assisted) cementoplasty have been introduced as new procedures. DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X‑rays and computed tomography (CT) are the imaging techniques of first choice. The most important questions concern recent fractures, instability and indications for minimally invasive treatment. PERFORMANCE: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are established methods for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis. ACHIEVEMENTS: Cementoplasty techniques are promising treatment options for traumatic spinal injuries. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The application of the techniques should best be carried out in individual cases within the framework of prospective controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.